H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Juan Ignacio Chela vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 1-0
Juan Ignacio Chela holds a 1–0 lead over Hicham Arazi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Ignacio Chela leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Chela won the 2002 Monte Carlo Masters third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2002* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Juan Ignacio Chela | 6-1 6-1 | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Ignacio Chela | Hicham Arazi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |