H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 19:16 UTC
Juan Ignacio Chela vs Juan Balcells H2H: 1-1
Juan Ignacio Chela and Juan Balcells are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Chela won the 2002 Amersfoort quarterfinal 7-6(7) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2002* | Amersfoort | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Juan Ignacio Chela | 7-6(7) 6-3 | Juan Balcells | Match data |
| Sep 14, 2001* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Juan Balcells | 6-3 6-4 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Juan Balcells | #869 | #57 | 733 | 1,733 | 38 | 46 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Juan Ignacio Chela | Juan Balcells | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #228 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #216 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #71 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #95 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #109 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |