H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Juan Ignacio Chela vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 1-0

Juan Ignacio Chela holds a 1–0 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Ignacio Chela leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Chela won the 2011 Roland Garros third round 6-2 6-4 3-6 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Juan Ignacio Chela
ARG Age 47 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Lukas Rosol
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Juan Ignacio Chela #34 6-2 6-4 3-6 7-6(5) Lukas Rosol #111 Match data May 28, 2011* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Juan Ignacio Chela #967 #15 1,510 1,908 307 270 53.2% 0 0 0 2 4 6
Lukas Rosol #1,777 #26 1,290 1,920 110 150 42.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Juan Ignacio Chela Lukas Rosol
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1999 0–3 0.0% #124 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2000 14–16 46.7% #63 1,558 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2001 10–10 50.0% #70 1,601 0 1 2007 0–1 0.0% #271 1,507 0 0
22 2002 44–27 62.0% #23 1,782 0 2 2008 1–2 33.3% #182 1,536 0 0
23 2003 35–27 56.5% #38 1,762 0 2 2009 0–1 0.0% #148 1,563 0 0
24 2004 33–26 55.9% #26 1,718 0 3 2010 0–2 0.0% #164 1,576 0 0
25 2005 28–26 51.9% #39 1,690 0 3 2011 5–13 27.8% #70 1,577 0 0
26 2006 27–26 50.9% #33 1,722 0 3 2012 17–18 48.6% #73 1,749 0 0
27 2007 39–23 62.9% #20 1,795 0 4 2013 21–25 45.7% #47 1,737 0 1
28 2008 11–12 47.8% #140 1,737 0 4 2014 28–26 51.9% #31 1,787 0 2
29 2009 9–14 39.1% #73 1,731 0 4 2015 19–28 40.4% #55 1,845 0 2
30 2010 28–24 53.8% #38 1,837 0 6 2016 14–23 37.8% #113 1,721 0 2
31 2011 24–24 50.0% #29 1,737 0 6 2017 2–3 40.0% #203 1,670 0 2
32 2012 5–12 29.4% #176 1,633 0 6 2018 2–2 50.0% #142 1,702 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2019 1–3 25.0% #180 1,661 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #199 1,658 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2022 0–2 0.0% #216 1,588 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Juan Ignacio Chela Lukas Rosol
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 2 5 7 28.6% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 24 14 38 63.2% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2003 20 14 34 58.8% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 20 11 31 64.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2005 20 14 34 58.8% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 2 8 10 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
26 2006 10 11 21 47.6% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2012 6 10 16 37.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2007 17 11 28 60.7% 21 10 31 67.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 14 17 31 45.2% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2008 2 4 6 33.3% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — 2014 10 15 25 40.0% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — — — — — 2015 12 16 28 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2010 7 11 18 38.9% 21 12 33 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 10 15 25 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 19 13 32 59.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 122 120 242 50.4% 179 131 310 57.7% 4 11 15 26.7% 2 8 10 20.0% — 57 92 149 38.3% 45 45 90 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 447/453 of Juan Ignacio Chela's and 258/260 of Lukas Rosol's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Juan Ignacio Chela Lukas Rosol
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 1.0 6.0 52.3% 62.2% 48.8% 66.7% 28.6% 55.8% 34.2%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 3/3 2.7 3.7 49.5% 69.2% 42.0% 41.0% 77.8% 55.6% 38.6%
23 2003 58/62 4.0 4.4 58.8% 69.7% 47.9% 54.8% 45.2% 60.5% 40.8% 2009 1/1 10.0 3.0 63.6% 74.3% 40.0% 66.7% 60.0% 61.8% 33.0%
24 2004 58/59 2.8 2.4 65.3% 66.8% 49.9% 53.6% 46.0% 60.9% 42.5% 2010 2/2 4.0 5.0 49.9% 70.6% 44.8% 77.8% 5.0% 57.9% 26.8%
25 2005 54/54 3.1 2.5 62.6% 68.2% 50.1% 56.5% 43.2% 61.3% 39.8% 2011 18/18 7.5 3.9 57.0% 68.7% 45.7% 63.3% 33.5% 59.0% 34.2%
26 2006 53/53 2.6 1.9 60.4% 69.2% 52.7% 63.5% 44.0% 62.5% 39.4% 2012 35/35 7.2 3.1 58.6% 74.4% 50.9% 63.0% 45.9% 64.7% 32.6%
27 2007 62/62 2.8 3.4 58.0% 69.7% 51.5% 54.4% 43.9% 62.2% 40.8% 2013 46/46 6.9 3.3 58.0% 71.9% 48.3% 61.9% 35.5% 62.0% 35.2%
28 2008 23/23 1.6 4.0 58.1% 62.8% 49.0% 56.5% 48.6% 56.9% 38.6% 2014 53/54 6.3 2.7 57.3% 71.5% 49.5% 55.0% 40.6% 62.0% 34.8%
29 2009 23/23 1.8 3.1 61.8% 66.1% 45.1% 61.1% 39.4% 58.1% 40.6% 2015 47/47 5.7 4.1 56.9% 72.2% 49.6% 52.8% 37.2% 62.3% 33.1%
30 2010 51/52 1.9 2.0 61.6% 65.8% 53.2% 54.6% 51.9% 60.9% 42.5% 2016 36/37 6.9 3.2 60.3% 71.1% 51.0% 64.2% 40.0% 63.0% 31.8%
31 2011 48/48 1.9 2.4 65.4% 65.6% 50.5% 58.7% 47.1% 60.3% 41.6% 2017 5/5 10.4 4.4 62.4% 80.1% 50.7% 51.4% 37.2% 68.0% 26.4%
32 2012 17/17 2.1 2.4 65.3% 61.8% 49.9% 56.0% 40.5% 57.6% 39.1% 2018 4/4 8.3 3.5 64.3% 71.7% 50.7% 70.4% 20.0% 64.3% 29.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 4/4 6.5 4.3 64.0% 68.8% 50.0% 48.2% 38.8% 62.0% 30.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 3.0 4.0 38.1% 81.3% 53.8% 50.0% — 64.3% 20.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 2/2 6.0 3.5 72.3% 65.1% 40.9% 47.8% 72.2% 57.7% 29.7%
Career — 447/577 2.6 2.8 61.6% 67.4% 50.4% 56.7% 45.4% 60.7% 40.8% — 258/260 6.6 3.4 58.1% 71.9% 49.3% 58.9% 39.1% 62.4% 33.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Juan Ignacio Chela Lukas Rosol
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1999 1464 96.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.28 0–1 — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 1559 133.5 — — — — -63 +120 — 44.9% -0.28 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 1602 129.7 — — — — -95 +120 — 56.9% +0.49 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) — +1.29 2007 1508 110.5 -1.57 +3.07 0.774 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.23
22 2002 1783 151.5 — — — — -32 +59 — 56.5% +0.48 18–8 (69%) 18–14 (56%) — -1.32 2008 1536 106.6 -1.01 -0.08 0.870 47.4% — — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
23 2003 1762 142.3 -1.02 +3.12 1.035 50.6% -22 +63 — 54.2% +0.28 11–8 (58%) 14–7 (67%) — -0.30 2009 1563 107.4 +0.04 -2.26 0.865 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.02
24 2004 1718 148.1 -1.13 +4.91 1.089 51.6% -9 +123 — 53.9% +0.42 11–10 (52%) 5–11 (31%) — -1.39 2010 1576 107.5 -1.31 -0.97 0.638 44.3% — — — 16.7% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.05
25 2005 1691 142.8 -0.78 +2.25 1.029 50.3% +64 +15 — 51.9% +0.01 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) — +0.41 2011 1577 125.6 -2.74 -2.58 0.833 47.0% 0 +90 — 33.3% -1.04 2–3 (40%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.09
26 2006 1723 142.8 +0.65 +1.91 1.053 50.9% +36 +10 — 50.4% -0.03 6–11 (35%) 6–11 (35%) — -0.31 2012 1750 140.7 +2.12 -3.63 0.925 49.1% -109 -26 -70 46.1% -0.24 6–4 (60%) 7–13 (35%) — -1.04
27 2007 1796 148.8 -0.41 +3.45 1.078 51.3% +38 +27 -340 56.3% +0.40 15–5 (75%) 8–10 (44%) — +2.42 2013 1737 143.6 -0.85 -1.68 0.926 49.0% -16 -11 -87 48.3% -0.21 6–9 (40%) 6–9 (40%) — +1.39
28 2008 1738 127.4 -3.84 +1.12 0.895 47.8% +27 +71 — 41.1% -0.75 6–2 (75%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.48 2014 1788 149.9 -1.20 -0.94 0.916 48.7% -81 +76 -127 47.6% -0.40 8–6 (57%) 18–10 (64%) — -1.09
29 2009 1732 139.8 -3.44 +1.91 0.970 49.2% -13 +55 — 43.1% -0.12 5–6 (45%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.53 2015 1846 149.4 -0.94 -1.88 0.879 48.2% -26 -21 -218 44.4% -0.39 8–10 (44%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.23
30 2010 1838 147.5 -1.66 +4.86 1.088 51.7% -116 +93 — 51.2% +0.38 9–7 (56%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.78 2016 1722 143.9 -0.35 -3.49 0.860 47.9% +13 +53 — 40.2% -0.66 7–7 (50%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.96
31 2011 1738 144.8 -2.16 +3.38 1.047 50.9% -88 +162 — 50.0% +0.18 9–10 (47%) 5–7 (42%) — +2.14 2017 1670 114.3 +0.43 -2.44 0.822 47.8% +16 — — 50.0% -0.07 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.08
32 2012 1634 126.2 -2.43 +0.71 0.923 48.4% +23 +118 — 42.9% -0.67 1–8 (11%) 4–2 (67%) — +1.58 2018 1702 116.1 -0.71 -0.20 0.821 47.8% — — — 45.5% -0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.52
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1661 113.9 -1.09 -2.40 0.789 46.4% +3 — — 38.5% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.37
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1659 107.1 -0.51 +0.11 0.583 41.1% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.30
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1546 101.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1588 106.8 -2.09 -4.12 0.702 43.9% — — — 28.6% -1.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.05
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1540 92.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1909 149.6 -1.24 +3.12 1.040 50.7% -9 +79 -340 51.6% +0.16 107–94 (53%) 92–103 (47%) 98.2 +0.62 — 1920 139.1 -0.59 -2.12 0.886 48.3% -33 +29 -121 43.7% -0.49 41–47 (47%) 70–66 (51%) 103.0 -1.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.