H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Juan Ignacio Chela vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 0-2
Nicolas Kiefer holds a 2–0 lead over Juan Ignacio Chela in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Kiefer leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 2006 Australian Open fourth round 7-6(4) 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Nicolas Kiefer | 7-6(4) 6-3 6-3 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
| Aug 23, 2003* | Long Island | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Nicolas Kiefer | 6-1 3-0 (ret.) | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Nicolas Kiefer | #720 | #4 | 2,447 | 1,984 | 343 | 252 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Ignacio Chela | Nicolas Kiefer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,921 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,921 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #72 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #21 | 1,897 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #22 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #48 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #49 | 1,893 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #116 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,717 | 0 | 6 |