H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Juan Ignacio Chela vs Robby Ginepri H2H: 2-0
Juan Ignacio Chela holds a 2–0 lead over Robby Ginepri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Juan Ignacio Chela leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Chela won the 2002 Miami Masters first round 3-6 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2002* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Juan Ignacio Chela | 3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | Robby Ginepri | Match data |
| Mar 7, 2002* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Juan Ignacio Chela | 5-7 7-6(6) 6-4 | Robby Ginepri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Robby Ginepri | #1,221 | #15 | 1,525 | 1,927 | 185 | 194 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Ignacio Chela | Robby Ginepri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #15 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #134 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #100 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #223 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |