H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Juan Ignacio Chela vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 1-0
Juan Ignacio Chela holds a 1–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Ignacio Chela leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Chela won the 2010 Hamburg second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2010* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Juan Ignacio Chela | 6-2 6-3 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Juan Ignacio Chela | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |