H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Juan Ignacio Chela vs Steve Darcis H2H: 1-0
Juan Ignacio Chela holds a 1–0 lead over Steve Darcis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Ignacio Chela leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Chela won the 2011 US Open second round 6-2 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2011* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Juan Ignacio Chela | 6-2 6-4 6-4 | Steve Darcis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Ignacio Chela | Steve Darcis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |