H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Juan Ignacio Chela vs Taylor Dent H2H: 0-3
Taylor Dent holds a 3–0 lead over Juan Ignacio Chela in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Taylor Dent leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Taylor Dent won the 2010 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(3) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2010* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Taylor Dent | 6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(3) 7-5 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2005* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Taylor Dent | 6-1 6-1 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
| Jan 23, 2004* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Taylor Dent | 3-6 6-4 4-6 7-6(4) 7-5 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Taylor Dent | #979 | #21 | 1,345 | 1,905 | 148 | 138 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Ignacio Chela | Taylor Dent | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #410 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #181 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #124 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 28–12 | 70.0% | #33 | 1,883 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #574 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #865 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #118 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |