H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Juan Ignacio Chela vs Thomas Johansson H2H: 1-1
Juan Ignacio Chela and Thomas Johansson are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Juan Ignacio Chela leads 1–0 on clay, while Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 2005 Madrid Masters third round 7-6(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2005* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Thomas Johansson | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
| May 11, 2005* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Juan Ignacio Chela | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Thomas Johansson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Thomas Johansson | #586 | #7 | 2,365 | 1,969 | 336 | 277 | 54.8% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Ignacio Chela | Thomas Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #422 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #117 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #39 | 1,825 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #14 | 1,746 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #30 | 1,855 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,892 | 1 | 9 |
| 31 | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #71 | 1,723 | 1 | 9 |
| 32 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,759 | 1 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #136 | 1,673 | 1 | 9 |