H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Juan Ignacio Chela vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 2-1
Juan Ignacio Chela holds a 2–1 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Juan Ignacio Chela leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Chela won the 2007 Barcelona third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2007* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Juan Ignacio Chela | 6-3 6-3 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Aug 17, 2006* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Juan Ignacio Chela | 6-7(5) 7-5 6-2 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Oct 13, 2005* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Vincent Spadea | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Juan Ignacio Chela | Vincent Spadea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |