H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Juan Ignacio Chela vs Vladimir Voltchkov H2H: 0-1
Vladimir Voltchkov holds a 1–0 lead over Juan Ignacio Chela in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vladimir Voltchkov leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Vladimir Voltchkov won the 2000 Wimbledon first round 6-7(5) 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BLR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2000* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Vladimir Voltchkov | 6-7(5) 6-3 3-6 6-3 6-0 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Vladimir Voltchkov | #1,605 | #25 | 1,108 | 1,784 | 50 | 68 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Juan Ignacio Chela | Vladimir Voltchkov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #46 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #99 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #120 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |