H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Juan Ignacio Londero vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 0-1
Lukas Rosol holds a 1–0 lead over Juan Ignacio Londero in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukas Rosol leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukas Rosol won the 2019 Moscow third round 6-7(4) 7-6(7) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 32
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2019* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Lukas Rosol | 6-7(4) 7-6(7) 6-3 | Juan Ignacio Londero | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Ignacio Londero | #1,011 | #50 | 1,017 | 1,810 | 34 | 49 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Lukas Rosol | #1,777 | #26 | 1,290 | 1,921 | 110 | 148 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Ignacio Londero | Lukas Rosol | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #278 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #79 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #73 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #276 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #55 | 1,846 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #203 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #180 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |