H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Juan Martin del Potro vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 3-3

Juan Martin del Potro and Ernests Gulbis are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Juan Martin del Potro leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Ernests Gulbis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ernests Gulbis won the 2017 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-4 7-6(3).

ARG Age 37 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
LAT Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 6, 2017* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Ernests Gulbis #589 6-4 6-4 7-6(3) Juan Martin del Potro #32 Match data
Feb 15, 2014* Rotterdam ATP 500 QF Hard Ernests Gulbis #24 6-3 6-4 Juan Martin del Potro #4 Match data
Feb 15, 2013* Rotterdam ATP 500 R16 Hard Juan Martin del Potro #7 7-6(5) 6-3 Ernests Gulbis #132 Match data
Jul 30, 2011* Los Angeles ATP 250 QF Hard Ernests Gulbis #84 6-2 6-4 Juan Martin del Potro #19 Match data
Feb 20, 2009* Memphis ATP 250 R16 Hard Juan Martin del Potro #7 6-3 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #42 Match data
Jan 16, 2009* Auckland ATP 250 R16 Hard Juan Martin del Potro #9 4-6 6-4 6-1 Ernests Gulbis #51 Match data
Aug 13, 2007 Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 Q2 Q Hard Juan Martin del Potro #78 7-5 6-3 Ernests Gulbis #90 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Juan Martin del Potro #761 #3 6,825 2,273 416 172 70.7% 1 1 0 9 11 22
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,139 221 232 48.8% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Juan Martin del Potro Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 10–12 45.5% #92 1,634 0 0 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 2007 26–24 52.0% #44 1,785 0 0 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 2008 44–16 73.3% #9 1,975 0 4 2008 22–20 52.4% #53 1,815 0 0
20 2009 51–16 76.1% #5 2,198 1 7 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,696 0 0
21 2010 3–3 50.0% #258 2,117 1 7 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,845 0 1
22 2011 46–17 73.0% #11 2,042 1 9 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,774 0 2
23 2012 57–16 78.1% #7 2,212 1 13 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,727 0 2
24 2013 52–16 76.5% #5 2,210 1 17 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,939 0 4
25 2014 7–3 70.0% #137 2,139 1 18 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,917 0 6
26 2015 2–2 50.0% #590 2,093 1 18 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2016 24–11 68.6% #38 2,115 1 19 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2017 38–17 69.1% #11 2,160 1 20 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,716 0 6
29 2018 48–13 78.7% #5 2,190 1 22 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,813 0 6
30 2019 8–5 61.5% #122 2,096 1 22 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,533 0 6
31 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,562 0 6
32 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6
33 2022 0–1 0.0% #761 2,066 1 22