H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Juan Martin del Potro vs Federico Delbonis H2H: 1-1
Juan Martin del Potro and Federico Delbonis are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Federico Delbonis leads 1–0 on clay, while Juan Martin del Potro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Federico Delbonis won the 2022 Buenos Aires third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 35
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2022* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Federico Delbonis | 6-1 6-3 | Juan Martin del Potro | Match data |
| Mar 12, 2017* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Juan Martin del Potro | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Federico Delbonis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Martin del Potro | #761 | #3 | 6,825 | 2,273 | 416 | 172 | 70.7% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 22 |
| Federico Delbonis | #939 | #33 | 1,435 | 1,905 | 158 | 195 | 44.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Martin del Potro | Federico Delbonis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #92 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2008 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #9 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,198 | 1 | 7 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #166 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #258 | 2,117 | 1 | 7 | 2012 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #11 | 2,042 | 1 | 9 | 2013 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #55 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2012 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #7 | 2,212 | 1 | 13 | 2014 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #60 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2013 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #5 | 2,210 | 1 | 17 | 2015 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2014 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #137 | 2,139 | 1 | 18 | 2016 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #590 | 2,093 | 1 | 18 | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #68 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2016 | 24–11 | 68.6% | #38 | 2,115 | 1 | 19 | 2018 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #80 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2017 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #11 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2019 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #76 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2018 | 48–13 | 78.7% | #5 | 2,190 | 1 | 22 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2019 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #122 | 2,096 | 1 | 22 | 2021 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #125 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,599 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #761 | 2,066 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |