H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Juan Martin del Potro vs Horacio Zeballos H2H: 0-1
Horacio Zeballos holds a 1–0 lead over Juan Martin del Potro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Horacio Zeballos leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Horacio Zeballos won the 2016 Miami Masters second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 41
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2016* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Horacio Zeballos | 6-4 6-4 | Juan Martin del Potro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Martin del Potro | #761 | #3 | 6,825 | 2,273 | 416 | 172 | 70.7% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 22 |
| Horacio Zeballos | #841 | #39 | 1,027 | 1,876 | 87 | 131 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Martin del Potro | Horacio Zeballos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #92 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #9 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2009 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,198 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #258 | 2,117 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2011 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #11 | 2,042 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2012 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #7 | 2,212 | 1 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2013 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #5 | 2,210 | 1 | 17 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2014 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #137 | 2,139 | 1 | 18 | 2010 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #590 | 2,093 | 1 | 18 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #109 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2016 | 24–11 | 68.6% | #38 | 2,115 | 1 | 19 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #85 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2017 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #11 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2013 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #56 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2018 | 48–13 | 78.7% | #5 | 2,190 | 1 | 22 | 2014 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #123 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2019 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #122 | 2,096 | 1 | 22 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #71 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #761 | 2,066 | 1 | 22 | 2018 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #173 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |