H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Juan Martin del Potro vs Igor Andreev H2H: 3-0
Juan Martin del Potro holds a 3–0 lead over Igor Andreev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Juan Martin del Potro leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Martin del Potro won the 2009 Roland Garros third round 6-4 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2009* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Juan Martin del Potro | 6-4 7-5 6-4 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| Oct 25, 2008* | Basel | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Juan Martin del Potro | 6-4 7-5 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| May 2, 2008* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Juan Martin del Potro | 1-6 6-0 6-4 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Martin del Potro | #761 | #3 | 6,825 | 2,273 | 416 | 172 | 70.7% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 22 |
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Martin del Potro | Igor Andreev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #92 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #9 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,198 | 1 | 7 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #258 | 2,117 | 1 | 7 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2011 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #11 | 2,042 | 1 | 9 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2012 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #7 | 2,212 | 1 | 13 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2013 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #5 | 2,210 | 1 | 17 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2014 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #137 | 2,139 | 1 | 18 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #590 | 2,093 | 1 | 18 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2016 | 24–11 | 68.6% | #38 | 2,115 | 1 | 19 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2017 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #11 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2018 | 48–13 | 78.7% | #5 | 2,190 | 1 | 22 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2019 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #122 | 2,096 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #761 | 2,066 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |