H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Juan Martin del Potro vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 1-0
Juan Martin del Potro holds a 1–0 lead over Juan Ignacio Chela in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Martin del Potro leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Martin del Potro won the 2006 Stuttgart third round 6-2 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2006* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Juan Martin del Potro | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | Juan Ignacio Chela | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Martin del Potro | #761 | #3 | 6,825 | 2,273 | 416 | 172 | 70.7% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 22 |
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Martin del Potro | Juan Ignacio Chela | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #92 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #9 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,198 | 1 | 7 | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #258 | 2,117 | 1 | 7 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2011 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #11 | 2,042 | 1 | 9 | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2012 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #7 | 2,212 | 1 | 13 | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2013 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #5 | 2,210 | 1 | 17 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2014 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #137 | 2,139 | 1 | 18 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #590 | 2,093 | 1 | 18 | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2016 | 24–11 | 68.6% | #38 | 2,115 | 1 | 19 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2017 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #11 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2018 | 48–13 | 78.7% | #5 | 2,190 | 1 | 22 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2019 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #122 | 2,096 | 1 | 22 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #761 | 2,066 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |