H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Juan Martin del Potro vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 1-0
Juan Martin del Potro holds a 1–0 lead over Lukasz Kubot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Martin del Potro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Martin del Potro won the 2012 Sydney fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2012* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Juan Martin del Potro | 6-4 6-2 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Martin del Potro | #761 | #3 | 6,825 | 2,273 | 416 | 172 | 70.7% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 22 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Juan Martin del Potro | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #92 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #9 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,198 | 1 | 7 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #258 | 2,117 | 1 | 7 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #11 | 2,042 | 1 | 9 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #7 | 2,212 | 1 | 13 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #5 | 2,210 | 1 | 17 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #137 | 2,139 | 1 | 18 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #590 | 2,093 | 1 | 18 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 24–11 | 68.6% | #38 | 2,115 | 1 | 19 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #11 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 48–13 | 78.7% | #5 | 2,190 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #122 | 2,096 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #761 | 2,066 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |