H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Juan Martin del Potro vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 1-0
Juan Martin del Potro holds a 1–0 lead over Sergiy Stakhovsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Martin del Potro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Martin del Potro won the 2015 Sydney third round 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2015* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Juan Martin del Potro | 6-3 7-6(4) | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Martin del Potro | #761 | #3 | 6,825 | 2,273 | 416 | 172 | 70.7% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 22 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Juan Martin del Potro | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #92 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #9 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,198 | 1 | 7 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #258 | 2,117 | 1 | 7 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #11 | 2,042 | 1 | 9 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #7 | 2,212 | 1 | 13 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #5 | 2,210 | 1 | 17 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #137 | 2,139 | 1 | 18 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #590 | 2,093 | 1 | 18 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 24–11 | 68.6% | #38 | 2,115 | 1 | 19 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #11 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 48–13 | 78.7% | #5 | 2,190 | 1 | 22 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #122 | 2,096 | 1 | 22 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #761 | 2,066 | 1 | 22 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |