H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Juan Martin del Potro vs Tim Henman H2H: 0-1
Tim Henman holds a 1–0 lead over Juan Martin del Potro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tim Henman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2006 Tokyo fourth round 7-6(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 37
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2006* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Tim Henman | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Juan Martin del Potro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Martin del Potro | #761 | #3 | 6,825 | 2,273 | 416 | 172 | 70.7% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 22 |
| Tim Henman | #615 | #4 | 2,826 | 2,027 | 468 | 260 | 64.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Martin del Potro | Tim Henman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2006 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #92 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2007 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #44 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2008 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #9 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #167 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2009 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,198 | 1 | 7 | 1995 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #258 | 2,117 | 1 | 7 | 1996 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2011 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #11 | 2,042 | 1 | 9 | 1997 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2012 | 57–16 | 78.1% | #7 | 2,212 | 1 | 13 | 1998 | 55–29 | 65.5% | #7 | 1,960 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2013 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #5 | 2,210 | 1 | 17 | 1999 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #12 | 1,785 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2014 | 7–3 | 70.0% | #137 | 2,139 | 1 | 18 | 2000 | 55–23 | 70.5% | #10 | 1,953 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #590 | 2,093 | 1 | 18 | 2001 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 1,924 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2016 | 24–11 | 68.6% | #38 | 2,115 | 1 | 19 | 2002 | 45–18 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,867 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2017 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #11 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2003 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,970 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2018 | 48–13 | 78.7% | #5 | 2,190 | 1 | 22 | 2004 | 41–20 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2019 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #122 | 2,096 | 1 | 22 | 2005 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #39 | 1,868 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #292 | 1,684 | 0 | 11 |
| 33 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #761 | 2,066 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |