H2H data updated: 2026-10-22 00:00 UTC

Juan Martin del Potro vs Viktor Troicki H2H: 7-0

Juan Martin del Potro holds a 7–0 lead over Viktor Troicki in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Juan Martin del Potro leads 5–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Martin del Potro won the 2017 Shanghai Masters quarterfinal 4-6 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Juan Martin del Potro
ARG Age 38 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main-draw meetings
Viktor Troicki
SRB Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Juan Martin del Potro #23 4-6 6-1 6-4 Viktor Troicki #54 Match data Oct 14, 2017* QF Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Juan Martin del Potro #9 7-6(2) 2-6 6-1 Viktor Troicki #32 Match data Aug 17, 2012* R16 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Juan Martin del Potro #10 6-0 6-1 Viktor Troicki #24 Match data Feb 18, 2012* QF ABN AMRO Open ATP 500 Hard
Juan Martin del Potro #5 6-3 7-5 6-0 Viktor Troicki #32 Match data May 28, 2009* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Juan Martin del Potro #5 6-3 1-6 6-3 Viktor Troicki #40 Match data Apr 30, 2009* R32 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Juan Martin del Potro #9 6-3 6-2 Viktor Troicki #53 Match data Jan 17, 2009* QF ASB Classic ATP 250 Hard
Juan Martin del Potro #19 6-3 6-3 Viktor Troicki #93 Match data Aug 17, 2008* F Washington Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Juan Martin del Potro #761 #3 6,825 2,271 426 174 71.0% 1 1 0 9 11 22
Viktor Troicki #1,433 #12 2,015 2,006 270 259 51.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Juan Martin del Potro Viktor Troicki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2006 10–12 45.5% #92 1,634 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2007 26–24 52.0% #44 1,785 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2008 44–16 73.3% #9 1,990 0 4 — — — — — — —
20 2009 51–16 76.1% #5 2,199 1 7 2006 1–1 50.0% #211 1,496 0 0
21 2010 3–3 50.0% #258 2,118 1 7 2007 5–7 41.7% #127 1,634 0 0
22 2011 46–17 73.0% #11 2,045 1 9 2008 19–19 50.0% #57 1,791 0 0
23 2012 62–17 78.5% #7 2,228 1 13 2009 27–27 50.0% #29 1,805 0 0
24 2013 52–16 76.5% #5 2,208 1 17 2010 36–25 59.0% #28 1,925 0 1
25 2014 7–3 70.0% #137 2,138 1 18 2011 34–24 58.6% #22 1,846 0 1
26 2015 2–2 50.0% #590 2,091 1 18 2012 21–27 43.8% #38 1,766 0 1
27 2016 29–12 70.7% #38 2,151 1 19 2013 18–18 50.0% #75 1,824 0 1
28 2017 38–17 69.1% #11 2,174 1 20 2014 8–4 66.7% #101 1,903 0 1
29 2018 48–13 78.7% #5 2,189 1 22 2015 33–27 55.0% #22 1,847 0 2
30 2019 8–5 61.5% #122 2,123 1 22 2016 33–28 54.1% #29 1,896 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2017 23–28 45.1% #55 1,814 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2018 6–13 31.6% #205 1,668 0 3
33 2022 0–1 0.0% #761 2,093 1 22 2019 4–4 50.0% #158 1,643 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2020 1–3 25.0% #201 1,648 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2021 1–4 20.0% #232 1,650 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Juan Martin del Potro Viktor Troicki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2006 3 4 7 42.9% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 21 19 40 52.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 27 11 38 71.1% 13 3 16 81.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 40 11 51 78.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2011 32 13 45 71.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2008 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
23 2012 40 12 52 76.9% 14 3 17 82.4% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2009 19 17 36 52.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
24 2013 43 12 55 78.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2010 28 17 45 62.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
25 2014 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 24 17 41 58.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
26 2015 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 13 17 30 43.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
27 2016 21 7 28 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2013 3 7 10 30.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2017 30 12 42 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 6 3 9 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
29 2018 37 9 46 80.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2015 19 17 36 52.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — —
30 2019 2 1 3 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 27 20 47 57.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 16 19 35 45.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 5 10 15 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 308 119 427 72.1% 76 36 112 67.9% 40 18 58 69.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — 179 168 347 51.6% 58 60 118 49.2% 33 31 64 51.6% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 579/600 of Juan Martin del Potro's and 521/529 of Viktor Troicki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Juan Martin del Potro Viktor Troicki
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2006 22/22 2.2 2.6 72.3% 64.5% 50.1% 58.2% 45.1% 60.5% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 49/50 6.4 2.7 62.8% 71.8% 53.5% 58.3% 47.0% 64.6% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 59/60 5.0 2.5 61.7% 74.7% 53.8% 62.3% 48.2% 66.5% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 66/67 8.3 2.6 62.0% 74.4% 53.5% 63.3% 40.9% 66.4% 39.7% 2006 2/2 8.0 1.0 61.4% 70.4% 53.0% 43.3% 63.9% 63.8% 37.0%
21 2010 6/6 15.2 4.7 58.4% 69.0% 44.1% 58.8% 33.1% 59.1% 36.7% 2007 12/12 4.2 3.7 59.0% 64.4% 42.5% 46.9% 45.4% 55.6% 37.8%
22 2011 61/63 7.8 2.0 62.2% 77.3% 57.3% 63.5% 48.4% 69.6% 39.8% 2008 37/38 6.2 2.2 61.7% 73.4% 51.5% 51.7% 37.9% 65.0% 37.2%
23 2012 73/79 7.7 2.1 64.8% 75.8% 55.0% 66.4% 43.6% 68.2% 39.6% 2009 54/54 6.9 2.6 57.6% 70.1% 44.7% 60.8% 46.7% 58.8% 36.4%
24 2013 67/68 7.1 2.1 65.2% 75.7% 54.9% 65.6% 43.4% 68.3% 38.8% 2010 59/61 9.2 2.9 60.1% 75.0% 50.6% 59.4% 46.1% 64.9% 41.3%
25 2014 10/10 11.1 1.6 65.1% 77.3% 58.5% 69.5% 43.7% 71.0% 35.6% 2011 58/58 7.9 2.4 58.9% 72.9% 47.2% 63.6% 47.1% 62.2% 39.9%
26 2015 4/4 9.3 2.0 63.9% 82.0% 54.5% 50.0% 38.9% 72.2% 31.6% 2012 47/48 8.1 2.3 59.7% 70.0% 44.0% 52.2% 42.4% 59.3% 36.5%
27 2016 35/41 6.4 2.5 64.0% 77.5% 53.8% 58.7% 38.0% 69.0% 37.4% 2013 36/36 6.7 2.1 59.6% 70.5% 47.5% 49.6% 43.4% 61.2% 37.5%
28 2017 54/55 8.5 2.3 64.4% 76.5% 51.2% 60.1% 43.8% 67.5% 36.7% 2014 12/12 9.1 2.2 55.0% 79.4% 52.5% 59.5% 45.9% 66.9% 40.2%
29 2018 60/61 9.3 1.8 65.6% 77.2% 53.6% 59.0% 43.8% 69.1% 40.3% 2015 60/60 10.0 2.0 62.9% 74.5% 49.8% 57.1% 41.3% 65.5% 36.2%
30 2019 12/13 10.8 2.7 64.9% 77.0% 53.1% 55.7% 43.2% 68.3% 37.5% 2016 60/61 8.5 2.3 61.2% 74.2% 49.9% 56.0% 40.2% 64.7% 36.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 49/51 6.6 3.2 60.7% 71.2% 46.7% 53.9% 41.1% 61.8% 35.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 19/19 8.2 3.2 63.5% 69.8% 41.2% 53.1% 33.5% 59.3% 33.5%
33 2022 1/1 1.0 0.0 69.6% 51.3% 41.2% 58.3% 100.0% 48.2% 26.2% 2019 8/8 8.0 4.3 62.0% 72.5% 51.7% 53.0% 46.4% 64.7% 33.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 3/4 8.3 1.3 72.0% 67.1% 48.2% 57.3% 32.3% 61.5% 31.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 5/5 7.8 1.2 63.5% 74.1% 55.0% 44.1% 19.9% 66.4% 26.2%
Career — 579/600 7.5 2.3 64.0% 75.2% 53.9% 62.0% 44.2% 67.4% 39.1% — 521/529 7.9 2.5 60.4% 72.4% 47.9% 56.1% 42.7% 62.6% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Juan Martin del Potro Viktor Troicki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2005 1489 99.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2006 1634 132.7 -1.67 +1.31 1.004 50.3% -26 -17 — 49.0% +0.31 4–3 (57%) 0–3 (0%) 100.8 +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2007 1785 150.1 +1.44 +2.80 1.100 51.8% -8 -190 -144 56.0% +0.53 6–7 (46%) 5–9 (36%) 96.2 -1.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2008 1991 156.7 +3.27 +4.69 1.241 53.6% +2 -152 -289 71.4% +1.45 6–0 (100%) 11–6 (65%) 112.1 +1.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 2199 173.8 +3.99 +4.56 1.179 52.7% +3 -179 — 68.8% +1.14 17–5 (77%) 18–9 (67%) 110.6 -1.53 2006 1497 108.2 +2.42 +2.63 1.020 50.3% — — — 40.0% +0.60 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.15
21 2010 2119 124.9 -1.86 -0.24 0.896 48.0% +1 — — 50.0% -0.23 1–1 0–2 — +0.07 2007 1634 117.7 -4.28 -0.04 0.852 47.0% -40 +23 — 44.4% -0.89 3–2 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 103.7 +0.12
22 2011 2045 166.0 +6.05 +3.34 1.311 54.3% -5 +81 -168 69.7% +1.32 6–1 (86%) 12–12 (50%) 101.9 -1.26 2008 1791 139.5 +1.49 +1.42 1.065 50.4% +8 -175 -178 49.4% -0.01 4–6 (40%) 6–6 (50%) 98.7 -1.41
23 2012 2229 175.3 +5.34 +3.94 1.245 53.5% -5 -35 -186 71.7% +1.24 10–4 (71%) 27–16 (63%) 107.9 -2.48 2009 1806 148.2 -2.68 +0.14 0.884 48.1% +16 -130 -137 48.4% -0.29 9–5 (64%) 7–8 (47%) 105.0 -2.24
24 2013 2208 176.9 +5.15 +3.49 1.227 53.2% +57 -66 -69 70.1% +1.06 17–11 (61%) 21–12 (64%) 104.1 +1.25 2010 1925 159.4 +1.84 +4.42 1.176 52.7% +14 -165 -279 57.0% +0.59 8–9 (47%) 9–12 (43%) 98.7 -1.68
25 2014 2138 142.5 +3.50 0.00 1.229 53.4% +41 — — 68.0% +0.92 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 +0.16 2011 1847 157.5 +0.04 +2.75 1.056 51.0% +36 +1 -155 58.3% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 9–11 (45%) 94.6 +1.82
26 2015 2092 120.9 +1.85 -1.89 1.138 51.8% +46 — — 44.4% +0.56 1–0 1–3 (25%) — -0.04 2012 1766 146.1 -2.61 -0.08 0.896 48.1% -2 +12 -4 45.3% -0.24 10–8 (56%) 9–9 (50%) 100.6 +0.30
27 2016 2152 166.2 +4.85 +2.07 1.205 53.1% +35 -45 -62 66.3% +0.94 5–1 (83%) 13–7 (65%) 105.6 -3.63 2013 1825 139.7 -1.42 -0.04 0.966 49.1% -123 +24 -40 51.1% -0.08 5–3 (63%) 6–6 (50%) 103.3 +0.52
28 2017 2175 172.9 +4.16 +2.23 1.129 51.7% +30 -70 — 64.0% +0.62 11–5 (69%) 18–7 (72%) 106.7 -3.90 2014 1904 142.7 +2.91 +1.97 1.214 53.2% -67 -35 — 62.5% +0.75 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.99
29 2018 2190 171.3 +5.25 +4.79 1.302 54.1% +18 -57 -120 74.8% +1.40 7–4 (64%) 21–10 (68%) 103.3 -0.93 2015 1847 149.3 +0.59 +0.86 1.051 50.6% -26 -34 +98 51.5% +0.18 14–8 (64%) 14–17 (45%) 101.0 +1.04
30 2019 2124 141.2 +2.38 +1.53 1.181 52.7% +53 -26 — 65.7% +1.17 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.25 2016 1896 159.7 +1.47 +0.63 1.039 50.5% +8 -14 -47 50.6% -0.07 14–7 (67%) 18–7 (72%) 110.5 +0.26
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1814 148.1 -1.84 -0.08 0.926 48.5% +24 +20 -93 43.4% -0.58 9–5 (64%) 13–8 (62%) 104.0 -1.56
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1668 123.1 -3.95 -1.30 0.822 46.3% +48 +95 — 33.3% -0.92 5–5 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 96.0 -0.36
33 2022 2094 102.5 -3.25 -4.28 0.506 38.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01 2019 1643 117.7 +0.21 -1.72 0.935 48.8% +10 — +142 47.8% -0.39 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 103.3 +0.39
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1648 116.8 -1.33 -1.24 0.824 47.6% +41 — — 37.5% -0.25 1–1 0–1 — +0.12
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1650 110.9 +0.71 -3.52 0.779 46.0% — — — 30.8% -0.92 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.04
Career — 2272 173.0 +4.08 +3.38 1.200 53.0% +14 -67 -144 67.4% +1.05 94–46 (67%) 149–100 (60%) 110.5 -2.14 — 2006 151.3 -0.39 +1.02 0.995 49.8% +6 -32 -45 49.9% -0.05 91–69 (57%) 106–105 (50%) 103.5 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.