H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Juan Monaco vs Andreas Seppi H2H: 3-3

Juan Monaco and Andreas Seppi are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Andreas Seppi leads 3–2 on clay, while Juan Monaco leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2014 Kitzbuhel quarterfinal 6-2 3-6 6-3.

ARG Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
ITA Age 42 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 1, 2014* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 QF Clay Juan Monaco #81 6-2 3-6 6-3 Andreas Seppi #48 Match data
Jul 17, 2014* Hamburg ATP 500 R32 Clay Andreas Seppi #44 1-6 6-0 7-6(3) Juan Monaco #86 Match data
May 29, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Andreas Seppi #33 6-2 6-4 6-4 Juan Monaco #76 Match data
Aug 31, 2011* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Juan Monaco #36 7-6(1) 6-2 6-2 Andreas Seppi #51 Match data
May 10, 2011* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Juan Monaco #37 6-1 4-6 6-2 Andreas Seppi #50 Match data
May 16, 2008* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Andreas Seppi #43 6-0 6-3 Juan Monaco #15 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Juan Monaco #226 #10 2,775 2,046 319 256 55.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Andreas Seppi #1,188 #18 1,895 1,977 363 397 47.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Juan Monaco Andreas Seppi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2003 0–2 0.0% #240 1,464 0 0
20 2004 16–12 57.1% #73 1,661 0 0 2004 5–9 35.7% #146 1,591 0 0
21 2005 18–25 41.9% #85 1,587 0 0 2005 17–16 51.5% #68 1,684 0 0
22 2006 18–23 43.9% #69 1,641 0 0 2006 19–28 40.4% #74 1,553 0 0
23 2007 41–19 68.3% #23 1,864 0 3 2007 20–23 46.5% #50 1,732 0 0
24 2008 27–20 57.4% #46 1,768 0 3 2008 27–27 50.0% #35 1,748 0 0
25 2009 34–24 58.6% #30 1,850 0 3 2009 23–28 45.1% #49 1,754 0 0
26 2010 28–18 60.9% #26 1,838 0 3 2010 24–28 46.2% #52 1,719 0 0
27 2011 26–24 52.0% #26 1,932 0 3 2011 25–24 51.0% #38 1,806 0 1
28 2012 36–17 67.9% #12 1,944 0 7 2012 35–24 59.3% #23 1,921 0 3
29 2013 18–21 46.2% #42 1,809 0 7 2013 28–27 50.9% #25 1,831 0 3
30 2014 20–18 52.6% #62 1,856 0 7 2014 22–27 44.9% #45 1,774 0 3
31 2015 21–19 52.5% #53 1,811 0 7 2015 26–24 52.0% #29 1,870 0 3
32 2016 16–13 55.2% #65 1,864 0 8 2016 18–23 43.9% #87 1,794 0 3
33 2017 0–3 0.0% #226 1,805 0 8 2017 17–17 50.0% #86 1,740 0 3
34 2018 24–21 53.3% #37 1,783 0 3
35 2019 17–24 41.5% #72 1,750 0 3
36 2020 7–7 50.0% #106 1,653 0 3
37 2021 7–13 35.0% #102 1,652 0 3
38 2022 2–5 28.6% #354 1,606 0 3