H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Juan Monaco vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 5-2

Juan Monaco holds a 5–2 lead over Ernests Gulbis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Juan Monaco leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2015 Hamburg third round 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Juan Monaco
ARG Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Ernests Gulbis
LAT Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 30, 2015* Hamburg ATP 500 R32 Clay Juan Monaco #38 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 Ernests Gulbis #80 Match data
Mar 28, 2015* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Juan Monaco #46 6-2 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #16 Match data
Jan 15, 2014* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Ernests Gulbis #24 1-6 6-4 7-6(4) 6-2 Juan Monaco #42 Match data
Apr 17, 2013* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Juan Monaco #20 6-0 3-6 6-3 Ernests Gulbis #56 Match data
Jan 20, 2010* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Juan Monaco #33 6-3 7-6(5) 6-1 Ernests Gulbis #82 Match data
Oct 9, 2009* Tokyo ATP 500 R16 Hard Ernests Gulbis #98 6-3 4-1 (ret.) Juan Monaco #31 Match data
Jul 12, 2007* Bastad ATP 250 R32 Clay Juan Monaco #31 7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #79 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Juan Monaco #226 #10 2,775 2,046 319 256 55.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,139 221 232 48.8% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Juan Monaco Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2008 22–20 52.4% #53 1,815 0 0
20 2004 16–12 57.1% #73 1,661 0 0 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,696 0 0
21 2005 18–25 41.9% #85 1,587 0 0 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,845 0 1
22 2006 18–23 43.9% #69 1,641 0 0 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,774 0 2
23 2007 41–19 68.3% #23 1,864 0 3 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,727 0 2
24 2008 27–20 57.4% #46 1,768 0 3 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,939 0 4
25 2009 34–24 58.6% #30 1,850 0 3 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,917 0 6
26 2010 28–18 60.9% #26 1,838 0 3 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2011 26–24 52.0% #26 1,932 0 3 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2012 36–17 67.9% #12 1,944 0 7 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,716 0 6
29 2013 18–21 46.2% #42 1,809 0 7 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,813 0 6
30 2014 20–18 52.6% #62 1,856 0 7 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,533 0 6
31 2015 21–19 52.5% #53 1,811 0 7 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,562 0 6
32 2016 16–13 55.2% #65 1,864 0 8 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6
33 2017 0–3 0.0% #226 1,805 0 8 — — — — — — —