H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Juan Monaco vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 7-5

Juan Monaco holds a 7–5 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Juan Monaco leads 5–3 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2016 Madrid Open first round 7-5 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Juan Monaco
ARG Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
7 – 5
12 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fernando Verdasco #52 7-5 7-6(3) Juan Monaco #98 Match data May 3, 2016* R64 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Juan Monaco #46 6-3 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #34 Match data Apr 1, 2015* R16 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Fernando Verdasco #23 6-4 6-2 Juan Monaco #10 Match data Oct 10, 2012* R32 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Fernando Verdasco #20 6-2 7-5 4-6 6-4 Juan Monaco #43 Match data May 24, 2011* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Juan Monaco #30 7-5 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #10 Match data Feb 26, 2010* QF Mexican Open ATP 500 Clay
Juan Monaco #61 6-1 3-1 (ret.) Fernando Verdasco #9 Match data Jul 18, 2009* QF Swedish Open ATP 250 Clay
Fernando Verdasco #8 7-5 6-2 Juan Monaco #47 Match data May 15, 2009* R16 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Juan Monaco #32 7-5 7-5 Fernando Verdasco #41 Match data Jul 28, 2007* SF Austrian Open Kitzbühel International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Juan Monaco #103 4-6 6-4 6-4 6-1 Fernando Verdasco #31 Match data Jun 2, 2006* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Juan Monaco #86 6-3 6-2 Fernando Verdasco #31 Match data Jan 12, 2006* R32 Sydney International ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Fernando Verdasco #39 7-5 6-3 Juan Monaco #92 Match data Oct 28, 2005* R16 St. Petersburg ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Juan Monaco #86 6-4 5-7 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #38 Match data Oct 1, 2004* R16 Palermo International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Juan Monaco #226 #10 2,775 2,052 327 260 55.7% 0 0 0 2 7 9
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,127 549 442 55.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Juan Monaco Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,591 0 0
20 2004 16–12 57.1% #73 1,661 0 0 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,730 0 1
21 2005 18–25 41.9% #85 1,577 0 0 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,790 0 1
22 2006 18–23 43.9% #69 1,639 0 0 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2007 41–19 68.3% #23 1,864 0 3 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2008 27–21 56.2% #46 1,760 0 3 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,875 0 2
25 2009 34–24 58.6% #30 1,851 0 3 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,003 0 3
26 2010 28–18 60.9% #26 1,837 0 3 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,927 0 5
27 2011 26–24 52.0% #26 1,940 0 3 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,931 0 5
28 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,935 0 7 2012 32–22 59.3% #24 1,901 0 5
29 2013 22–21 51.2% #42 1,822 0 8 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,896 0 5
30 2014 22–19 53.7% #62 1,864 0 8 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,879 0 6
31 2015 21–19 52.5% #53 1,812 0 8 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 2016 17–14 54.8% #65 1,875 0 9 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,823 0 7
33 2017 0–3 0.0% #226 1,814 0 9 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,914 0 7
35 — — — — — — — 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Juan Monaco Fernando Verdasco
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 20 11 31 64.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 14 14 28 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2005 14 12 26 53.8% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
22 2006 3 8 11 27.3% 15 15 30 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 17 9 26 65.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2007 12 9 21 57.1% 28 8 36 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 18 14 32 56.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 2008 9 10 19 47.4% 18 10 28 64.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 20 16 36 55.6% 17 8 25 68.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
25 2009 7 10 17 41.2% 27 13 40 67.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 35 15 50 70.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
26 2010 14 10 24 58.3% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — — — — — 2010 21 13 34 61.8% 22 7 29 75.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2011 15 12 27 55.6% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 19 14 33 57.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 22 6 28 78.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 11 10 21 52.4% 19 10 29 65.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2013 2 7 9 22.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 9 13 22 40.9% 12 9 21 57.1% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
30 2014 7 7 14 50.0% 15 12 27 55.6% — — — — — — — — 2014 11 11 22 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2015 11 14 25 44.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
32 2016 6 7 13 46.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 13 15 28 46.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 18 15 33 54.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 18 14 32 56.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 13 14 27 48.1% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 96 108 204 47.1% 220 136 356 61.8% 7 11 18 38.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — 259 235 494 52.4% 231 156 387 59.7% 51 44 95 53.7% 8 7 15 53.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 578/587 of Juan Monaco's and 988/991 of Fernando Verdasco's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Juan Monaco Fernando Verdasco
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 3/3 1.7 6.3 71.8% 56.3% 32.1% 54.4% 39.3% 49.7% 37.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 18/19 5.0 4.3 64.8% 68.3% 55.7% 51.0% 42.6% 63.8% 34.4%
20 2004 28/28 1.9 2.5 66.9% 63.4% 48.9% 47.3% 47.8% 58.5% 41.8% 2004 56/56 4.8 3.2 66.0% 71.0% 56.3% 65.5% 40.6% 65.7% 37.3%
21 2005 42/43 2.0 2.1 65.5% 63.7% 50.7% 51.2% 43.6% 58.9% 37.4% 2005 61/61 6.6 3.7 65.1% 72.5% 51.7% 60.0% 44.5% 65.2% 38.9%
22 2006 41/41 1.9 1.8 64.0% 65.6% 52.2% 56.6% 40.4% 60.9% 40.3% 2006 56/56 3.9 3.8 72.5% 68.7% 49.7% 62.8% 43.6% 63.3% 38.3%
23 2007 60/60 3.2 1.9 65.2% 69.0% 56.6% 57.3% 50.6% 64.7% 41.1% 2007 59/59 4.6 3.4 72.4% 70.2% 52.2% 55.3% 38.6% 65.1% 38.2%
24 2008 46/48 2.7 1.9 64.8% 65.5% 51.6% 50.7% 43.9% 60.1% 41.8% 2008 72/72 3.8 4.1 72.6% 69.3% 53.0% 55.6% 47.6% 64.7% 40.8%
25 2009 58/58 1.9 2.0 68.0% 66.6% 53.2% 52.0% 48.6% 62.4% 42.9% 2009 75/75 6.1 3.7 69.1% 73.1% 54.3% 62.2% 46.5% 67.1% 41.1%
26 2010 46/46 3.4 2.5 65.3% 68.0% 52.0% 58.2% 45.8% 62.4% 40.7% 2010 64/64 5.4 4.8 67.1% 71.2% 49.4% 60.0% 44.6% 64.0% 40.3%
27 2011 49/50 2.0 1.9 66.1% 66.1% 52.9% 57.1% 46.6% 61.4% 40.7% 2011 58/58 5.5 3.9 68.8% 70.7% 51.3% 61.5% 44.9% 64.6% 38.1%
28 2012 53/55 1.7 2.0 67.7% 67.4% 52.8% 55.8% 45.5% 62.4% 43.2% 2012 53/54 4.6 3.8 69.7% 69.7% 51.4% 64.4% 42.1% 64.1% 38.3%
29 2013 43/43 2.0 1.9 69.0% 65.2% 52.2% 50.8% 49.4% 61.4% 42.4% 2013 50/51 5.9 5.0 61.7% 72.8% 54.0% 56.4% 36.3% 65.3% 37.4%
30 2014 41/41 1.9 1.6 69.8% 64.7% 54.8% 49.0% 45.9% 61.7% 41.1% 2014 46/46 5.7 4.7 66.3% 71.7% 51.8% 65.6% 43.2% 64.5% 37.3%
31 2015 40/40 2.2 1.4 71.9% 64.4% 51.7% 59.5% 41.9% 60.6% 39.9% 2015 50/50 7.7 4.1 64.6% 73.5% 52.3% 60.8% 35.2% 66.1% 35.3%
32 2016 28/31 1.9 1.1 74.5% 64.0% 55.4% 54.8% 39.6% 61.4% 40.7% 2016 55/55 6.3 3.9 64.0% 73.2% 51.4% 62.1% 38.4% 65.1% 37.8%
33 2017 3/3 0.7 0.7 63.6% 60.5% 47.8% 52.2% 59.5% 55.8% 36.6% 2017 54/54 4.0 3.4 69.0% 70.6% 51.0% 53.7% 45.7% 64.6% 39.5%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 61/61 6.7 4.2 63.1% 72.0% 48.7% 59.3% 42.9% 63.4% 39.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 53/53 7.7 3.7 63.8% 71.8% 49.4% 62.4% 40.0% 63.7% 36.0%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 13/13 6.3 2.6 67.5% 68.9% 49.5% 59.7% 29.5% 62.7% 36.4%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 10/10 3.9 3.2 66.9% 60.7% 48.4% 54.2% 28.3% 56.6% 35.0%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 16/16 4.3 2.9 63.4% 66.0% 48.6% 58.4% 37.6% 59.8% 36.2%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 5/5 1.0 4.0 62.6% 53.7% 32.4% 36.3% 45.3% 45.6% 34.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Juan Monaco Fernando Verdasco
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1502 102.0 -2.56 -2.05 0.736 44.2% — +27 — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 — — +0.02
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1592 125.8 +1.64 -0.91 0.950 48.7% +9 -89 — 39.6% -0.77 2–4 (33%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.48
20 2004 1662 138.6 -2.03 +3.31 1.009 50.1% -131 +91 — 51.5% +0.16 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.82 2004 1731 140.6 +2.76 +0.54 1.085 51.4% -84 +24 -92 53.2% +0.29 6–8 (43%) 11–12 (48%) — -1.34
21 2005 1577 124.6 -2.76 -0.23 0.912 48.2% -97 +112 — 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 5–9 (36%) — +0.19 2005 1791 146.9 +2.51 +2.36 1.116 51.9% -27 +11 -149 55.1% +0.46 10–12 (45%) 12–11 (52%) — -2.07
22 2006 1640 125.6 -0.75 +2.74 1.032 50.5% -158 +76 — 46.7% -0.17 3–8 (27%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.40 2006 1727 137.0 +0.96 +1.48 1.042 50.6% -72 +110 +30 56.5% +0.19 10–10 (50%) 14–10 (58%) — +0.48
23 2007 1865 145.9 +1.71 +3.90 1.166 52.7% -172 +120 — 60.6% +0.84 16–6 (73%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.58 2007 1864 150.9 +2.40 +2.23 1.097 51.3% -58 -13 -91 54.4% +0.38 11–10 (52%) 10–14 (42%) — -1.77
24 2008 1760 137.9 -2.43 +3.95 1.049 50.9% -60 +159 — 55.5% +0.11 7–7 (50%) 9–6 (60%) — +1.07 2008 1876 151.0 +1.44 +3.82 1.154 52.4% -51 +93 +36 58.0% +0.69 13–9 (59%) 13–14 (48%) — +1.79
25 2009 1852 157.8 -0.30 +5.86 1.140 52.3% -132 +156 — 57.5% +0.53 6–8 (43%) 7–8 (47%) — -2.94 2009 2004 172.3 +4.14 +5.15 1.247 53.9% +20 +44 -100 66.0% +1.22 11–12 (48%) 15–19 (44%) — -0.23
26 2010 1838 151.8 -0.23 +3.49 1.081 51.6% -17 +79 — 58.8% +0.54 9–8 (53%) 12–6 (67%) — +2.65 2010 1928 161.5 +1.35 +3.83 1.119 52.0% +11 +172 — 59.1% +0.69 18–5 (78%) 17–17 (50%) — +1.41
27 2011 1940 155.8 -0.55 +4.02 1.054 50.7% +9 -75 — 51.3% +0.12 7–9 (44%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.04 2011 1931 156.9 +1.76 +2.02 1.077 51.0% -19 +115 -49 55.4% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.03
28 2012 1936 158.3 -0.31 +5.86 1.150 52.6% -29 +125 -371 62.2% +0.75 12–7 (63%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.18 2012 1902 158.3 +1.78 +1.64 1.068 50.9% -15 +110 -16 57.3% +0.45 7–6 (54%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.32
29 2013 1822 149.5 -1.37 +4.76 1.098 51.6% -49 +142 -201 54.3% +0.49 4–10 (29%) 5–10 (33%) — +2.05 2013 1897 150.8 +1.90 +1.27 1.077 50.9% -69 +47 +113 54.3% +0.20 11–12 (48%) 14–10 (58%) — -0.19
30 2014 1864 149.5 -1.50 +3.48 1.073 51.0% -49 +48 — 52.9% +0.15 7–9 (44%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.07 2014 1880 147.7 +0.99 +0.74 1.048 50.8% -58 +69 +74 55.4% +0.36 11–12 (48%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.67
31 2015 1813 155.6 -2.84 +3.06 1.012 50.2% +34 +69 -157 51.0% +0.17 7–6 (54%) 3–11 (21%) — -0.21 2015 1822 158.0 +2.13 -0.07 1.043 50.6% -12 +53 +115 47.4% +0.18 12–11 (52%) 13–16 (45%) — -2.42
32 2016 1875 154.8 -1.63 +3.93 1.056 50.7% -44 +70 — 52.2% +0.15 4–1 (80%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.33 2016 1823 157.6 +1.70 +1.52 1.083 51.2% -31 +108 +59 53.3% +0.30 6–12 (33%) 15–12 (56%) — -1.95
33 2017 1814 105.4 -2.73 -1.34 0.827 45.7% — — — 14.3% -2.00 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.13 2017 1896 164.3 +0.98 +3.38 1.115 51.7% -12 +46 -99 55.4% +0.30 6–15 (29%) 18–9 (67%) — -2.48
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1915 159.9 -0.10 +2.46 1.065 50.9% +25 +13 -172 51.9% +0.27 15–11 (58%) 8–17 (32%) — -1.33
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1810 151.6 -0.18 +0.45 0.990 50.1% +22 +37 +5 51.4% +0.28 13–13 (50%) 8–11 (42%) — -0.47
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1768 132.5 -0.34 -1.01 0.975 49.0% +72 — — 48.5% -0.27 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -0.38
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1627 114.6 -2.83 -1.10 0.807 46.0% — +81 — 25.0% -1.25 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.25
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1604 122.9 -3.29 -0.30 0.900 48.1% +74 +90 — 36.6% -0.81 2–4 (33%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.75
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1536 96.8 -6.12 -1.90 0.625 40.2% +105 — — 9.1% -3.27 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.03
Career — 2053 154.7 -0.99 +3.80 1.069 51.1% -64 +97 -261 54.1% +0.29 92–89 (51%) 90–105 (46%) 96.3 +0.33 — 2128 158.8 +1.50 +2.00 1.077 51.2% -17 +67 -9 54.3% +0.35 175–178 (50%) 214–226 (49%) 97.0 -0.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.