H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Juan Monaco vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 0-3
Guillermo Canas holds a 3–0 lead over Juan Monaco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Canas leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Canas won the 2008 Indian Wells Masters third round 6-3 6-7(1) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2008* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Guillermo Canas | 6-3 6-7(1) 6-2 | Juan Monaco | Match data |
| Jun 5, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Guillermo Canas | 6-0 6-4 6-2 | Juan Monaco | Match data |
| May 5, 2005* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Guillermo Canas | 6-0 6-0 | Juan Monaco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Monaco | #226 | #10 | 2,775 | 2,046 | 319 | 256 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Monaco | Guillermo Canas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #73 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2008 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #46 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2009 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,850 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2010 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2011 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #26 | 1,932 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2012 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,944 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2014 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #62 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2015 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2016 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,805 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |