H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Juan Monaco vs Horacio Zeballos H2H: 4-0
Juan Monaco holds a 4–0 lead over Horacio Zeballos in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Juan Monaco leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2014 Rio de Janeiro third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 41
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2014* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Juan Monaco | 6-3 6-1 | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2011* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Juan Monaco | 7-5 7-6(3) | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
| Feb 20, 2010* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Juan Monaco | 7-5 6-1 | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
| Jan 13, 2010* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Juan Monaco | 6-3 6-0 | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Monaco | #226 | #10 | 2,775 | 2,046 | 319 | 256 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Horacio Zeballos | #841 | #39 | 1,027 | 1,876 | 87 | 131 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Monaco | Horacio Zeballos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2004 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #73 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #46 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,850 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #109 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #26 | 1,932 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #85 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,944 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #56 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #123 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2014 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #62 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2015 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #71 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2016 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,805 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #173 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |