H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Juan Monaco vs Jan Hernych H2H: 2-0
Juan Monaco holds a 2–0 lead over Jan Hernych in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Juan Monaco leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2009 Stockholm third round 6-2 5-7 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2009* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Juan Monaco | 6-2 5-7 7-5 | Jan Hernych | Match data |
| Jul 19, 2007* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Juan Monaco | 6-2 6-1 | Jan Hernych | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Monaco | #226 | #10 | 2,775 | 2,046 | 319 | 256 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Jan Hernych | #1,606 | #59 | 1,157 | 1,780 | 79 | 115 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Monaco | Jan Hernych | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2004 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #73 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #46 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,850 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #74 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #26 | 1,932 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #156 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,944 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | 2009 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #113 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #62 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #168 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2016 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #193 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,805 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #424 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |