H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Juan Monaco vs Janko Tipsarevic H2H: 2-2
Juan Monaco and Janko Tipsarevic are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Juan Monaco leads 2–1 on clay, while Janko Tipsarevic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2013 Madrid Masters second round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2013* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Juan Monaco | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| Nov 2, 2012* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Janko Tipsarevic | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Juan Monaco | Match data |
| Jul 15, 2012* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Janko Tipsarevic | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | Juan Monaco | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2011* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Juan Monaco | 6-2 6-4 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Monaco | #226 | #10 | 2,775 | 2,046 | 319 | 256 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Janko Tipsarevic | #755 | #8 | 3,320 | 2,072 | 245 | 240 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Monaco | Janko Tipsarevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #73 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #117 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #46 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #49 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,850 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #26 | 1,932 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #9 | 2,006 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2012 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,944 | 0 | 7 | 2012 | 48–26 | 64.9% | #9 | 1,972 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2014 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #62 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #410 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2016 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #144 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,805 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #105 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #219 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |