H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Juan Monaco vs Jose Acasuso H2H: 1-3
Jose Acasuso holds a 3–1 lead over Juan Monaco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jose Acasuso leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2009 Hamburg third round 6-1 1-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2009* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Juan Monaco | 6-1 1-1 (ret.) | Jose Acasuso | Match data |
| Feb 12, 2009* | Costa Do Sauipe | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jose Acasuso | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Juan Monaco | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2006* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Jose Acasuso | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Juan Monaco | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2004* | Sopot | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Jose Acasuso | 6-4 6-2 | Juan Monaco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Monaco | #226 | #10 | 2,775 | 2,046 | 319 | 256 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| Jose Acasuso | #1,107 | #20 | 1,640 | 1,830 | 181 | 178 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Juan Monaco | Jose Acasuso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #86 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2004 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #73 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #101 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2005 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #67 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2006 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2007 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2008 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #46 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2009 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,850 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2010 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2011 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #26 | 1,932 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #253 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2012 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,944 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #255 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2014 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #62 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2015 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2016 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,805 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |