H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Juan Monaco vs Julien Benneteau H2H: 1-0

Juan Monaco holds a 1–0 lead over Julien Benneteau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Monaco leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2012 Kuala Lumpur final 7-5 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Juan Monaco
ARG Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Julien Benneteau
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Juan Monaco #11 7-5 4-6 6-3 Julien Benneteau #34 Match data Sep 30, 2012* F Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Juan Monaco #226 #10 2,775 2,052 327 260 55.7% 0 0 0 2 7 9
Julien Benneteau #140 #25 1,608 1,959 270 293 48.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Juan Monaco Julien Benneteau
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2001 1–1 50.0% #271 1,495 0 0
20 2004 16–12 57.1% #73 1,661 0 0 2002 0–2 0.0% #253 1,452 0 0
21 2005 18–25 41.9% #85 1,577 0 0 2003 3–7 30.0% #138 1,548 0 0
22 2006 18–23 43.9% #69 1,639 0 0 2004 14–15 48.3% #65 1,637 0 0
23 2007 41–19 68.3% #23 1,864 0 3 2005 5–18 21.7% #165 1,535 0 0
24 2008 27–21 56.2% #46 1,760 0 3 2006 24–22 52.2% #40 1,707 0 0
25 2009 34–24 58.6% #30 1,851 0 3 2007 22–28 44.0% #68 1,672 0 0
26 2010 28–18 60.9% #26 1,837 0 3 2008 22–20 52.4% #43 1,786 0 0
27 2011 26–24 52.0% #26 1,940 0 3 2009 26–28 48.1% #46 1,794 0 0
28 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,935 0 7 2010 24–19 55.8% #44 1,854 0 0
29 2013 22–21 51.2% #42 1,822 0 8 2011 21–21 50.0% #52 1,872 0 0
30 2014 22–19 53.7% #62 1,864 0 8 2012 27–22 55.1% #35 1,883 0 0
31 2015 21–19 52.5% #53 1,812 0 8 2013 27–25 51.9% #35 1,863 0 0
32 2016 17–14 54.8% #65 1,875 0 9 2014 25–22 53.2% #25 1,895 0 0
33 2017 0–3 0.0% #226 1,814 0 9 2015 1–5 16.7% #527 1,800 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2016 7–14 33.3% #130 1,806 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2017 13–13 50.0% #56 1,863 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2018 8–11 42.1% #140 1,806 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Juan Monaco Julien Benneteau
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 14 14 28 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 2006 3 8 11 27.3% 15 15 30 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 5 8 13 38.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 2007 12 9 21 57.1% 28 8 36 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2008 9 10 19 47.4% 18 10 28 64.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 14 12 26 53.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 2009 7 10 17 41.2% 27 13 40 67.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 13 18 31 41.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2010 14 10 24 58.3% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — — — — — 2008 10 13 23 43.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
27 2011 15 12 27 55.6% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 16 16 32 50.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
28 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 22 6 28 78.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2010 14 11 25 56.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
29 2013 2 7 9 22.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 13 10 23 56.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
30 2014 7 7 14 50.0% 15 12 27 55.6% — — — — — — — — 2012 19 15 34 55.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
31 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 21 17 38 55.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
32 2016 6 7 13 46.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 22 16 38 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 6 10 16 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
Career — 96 108 204 47.1% 220 136 356 61.8% 7 11 18 38.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — 174 178 352 49.4% 46 63 109 42.2% 36 40 76 47.4% 14 12 26 53.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 578/587 of Juan Monaco's and 556/561 of Julien Benneteau's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Juan Monaco Julien Benneteau
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 1/2 5.0 1.0 52.4% 60.5% 41.0% 53.8% 50.0% 51.2% 39.4%
20 2004 28/28 1.9 2.5 66.9% 63.4% 48.9% 47.3% 47.8% 58.5% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 42/43 2.0 2.1 65.5% 63.7% 50.7% 51.2% 43.6% 58.9% 37.4% 2003 10/10 2.7 2.8 63.9% 60.1% 47.6% 47.1% 29.1% 55.7% 35.4%
22 2006 41/41 1.9 1.8 64.0% 65.6% 52.2% 56.6% 40.4% 60.9% 40.3% 2004 29/29 3.9 3.3 62.3% 68.8% 48.6% 55.1% 39.6% 61.2% 36.9%
23 2007 60/60 3.2 1.9 65.2% 69.0% 56.6% 57.3% 50.6% 64.7% 41.1% 2005 23/23 3.7 2.8 64.2% 64.0% 42.8% 58.6% 39.5% 56.5% 36.3%
24 2008 46/48 2.7 1.9 64.8% 65.5% 51.6% 50.7% 43.9% 60.1% 41.8% 2006 46/46 5.4 3.1 67.2% 66.8% 48.4% 59.4% 38.9% 60.6% 37.6%
25 2009 58/58 1.9 2.0 68.0% 66.6% 53.2% 52.0% 48.6% 62.4% 42.9% 2007 50/50 4.3 3.1 64.6% 66.5% 52.5% 54.8% 38.9% 61.5% 37.2%
26 2010 46/46 3.4 2.5 65.3% 68.0% 52.0% 58.2% 45.8% 62.4% 40.7% 2008 41/42 4.3 3.3 64.1% 70.0% 50.6% 57.6% 37.4% 63.1% 37.9%
27 2011 49/50 2.0 1.9 66.1% 66.1% 52.9% 57.1% 46.6% 61.4% 40.7% 2009 54/54 5.6 3.2 66.0% 69.9% 48.7% 56.9% 39.1% 62.7% 36.7%
28 2012 53/55 1.7 2.0 67.7% 67.4% 52.8% 55.8% 45.5% 62.4% 43.2% 2010 43/43 7.0 3.7 65.7% 69.6% 47.9% 56.5% 40.0% 62.0% 36.4%
29 2013 43/43 2.0 1.9 69.0% 65.2% 52.2% 50.8% 49.4% 61.4% 42.4% 2011 42/42 5.8 3.3 64.0% 71.8% 50.8% 58.7% 39.8% 64.2% 36.3%
30 2014 41/41 1.9 1.6 69.8% 64.7% 54.8% 49.0% 45.9% 61.7% 41.1% 2012 47/49 6.9 4.0 65.7% 71.0% 50.4% 55.1% 46.8% 63.8% 38.1%
31 2015 40/40 2.2 1.4 71.9% 64.4% 51.7% 59.5% 41.9% 60.6% 39.9% 2013 51/52 6.2 2.9 63.4% 70.0% 50.3% 50.8% 38.5% 62.8% 38.0%
32 2016 28/31 1.9 1.1 74.5% 64.0% 55.4% 54.8% 39.6% 61.4% 40.7% 2014 47/47 7.6 2.9 64.6% 73.1% 50.9% 62.1% 40.7% 65.0% 35.9%
33 2017 3/3 0.7 0.7 63.6% 60.5% 47.8% 52.2% 59.5% 55.8% 36.6% 2015 6/6 6.0 1.7 66.0% 71.8% 53.6% 22.8% 34.0% 65.3% 27.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 21/21 7.9 3.0 62.1% 69.6% 53.4% 59.6% 33.2% 63.2% 34.9%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 26/26 7.4 4.2 60.4% 75.3% 49.6% 57.6% 38.0% 65.3% 36.3%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 19/19 10.1 6.0 58.3% 70.2% 45.7% 58.1% 37.7% 59.9% 34.8%
Career — 578/587 2.2 1.9 67.3% 65.9% 52.8% 54.1% 45.8% 61.5% 41.1% — 556/563 5.9 3.4 64.3% 69.6% 49.6% 56.4% 39.3% 62.4% 36.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Juan Monaco Julien Benneteau
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1498 100.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1495 107.8 -2.66 +3.68 0.808 45.8% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — +0.23
20 2004 1662 138.6 -2.03 +3.31 1.009 50.1% -131 +91 — 51.5% +0.16 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.7 -0.82 2002 1452 94.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.80 — — — -0.09
21 2005 1577 124.6 -2.76 -0.23 0.912 48.2% -97 +112 — 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 5–9 (36%) 94.3 +0.19 2003 1548 113.3 -3.92 -1.10 0.798 45.3% +23 -61 — 26.9% -1.73 2–0 2–0 — -0.28
22 2006 1640 125.6 -0.75 +2.74 1.032 50.5% -158 +76 — 46.7% -0.17 3–8 (27%) 5–6 (45%) 94.7 -1.40 2004 1638 129.1 -1.57 +1.46 0.952 48.9% +6 -44 -85 48.6% -0.22 3–4 (43%) 1–7 (13%) 95.9 -0.41
23 2007 1865 145.9 +1.71 +3.90 1.166 52.7% -172 +120 — 60.6% +0.84 16–6 (73%) 7–12 (37%) 106.6 +0.58 2005 1536 119.2 -3.91 -0.41 0.835 46.9% +40 +10 -13 27.8% -1.39 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.2 -0.33
24 2008 1760 137.9 -2.43 +3.95 1.049 50.9% -60 +159 — 55.5% +0.11 7–7 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 98.3 +1.07 2006 1707 133.9 -1.05 +0.70 0.955 49.2% +20 -94 -191 47.5% -0.30 10–5 (67%) 13–11 (54%) 108.1 +0.54
25 2009 1852 157.8 -0.30 +5.86 1.140 52.3% -132 +156 — 57.5% +0.53 6–8 (43%) 7–8 (47%) 96.0 -2.94 2007 1673 130.1 -1.22 +0.55 0.965 49.2% -11 -88 -162 46.0% -0.36 7–10 (41%) 11–8 (58%) 99.7 +1.04
26 2010 1838 151.8 -0.23 +3.49 1.081 51.6% -17 +79 — 58.8% +0.54 9–8 (53%) 12–6 (67%) 104.1 +2.65 2008 1787 143.1 +0.15 +2.10 1.026 50.2% -39 -21 -283 48.6% -0.27 7–7 (50%) 8–3 (73%) 105.9 -3.04
27 2011 1940 155.8 -0.55 +4.02 1.054 50.7% +9 -75 — 51.3% +0.12 7–9 (44%) 8–9 (47%) 99.2 -0.04 2009 1794 145.6 -0.39 +0.68 0.985 49.7% +29 -82 -256 46.5% -0.08 15–11 (58%) 8–13 (38%) 101.6 -0.56
28 2012 1936 158.3 -0.31 +5.86 1.150 52.6% -29 +125 -371 62.2% +0.75 12–7 (63%) 11–7 (61%) 106.1 +2.18 2010 1854 142.2 -1.47 +0.40 0.958 49.2% -5 -172 -138 53.2% -0.07 8–5 (62%) 14–6 (70%) 107.8 -0.34
29 2013 1822 149.5 -1.37 +4.76 1.098 51.6% -49 +142 -201 54.3% +0.49 4–10 (29%) 5–10 (33%) 86.9 +2.05 2011 1872 143.5 +0.78 -0.62 1.014 50.1% +21 -182 -112 48.6% +0.05 8–8 (50%) 9–8 (53%) 99.4 -0.79
30 2014 1864 149.5 -1.50 +3.48 1.073 51.0% -49 +48 — 52.9% +0.15 7–9 (44%) 9–9 (50%) 97.7 +0.07 2012 1884 153.7 +0.89 +1.57 1.053 51.0% -17 -159 -45 58.5% +0.32 6–12 (33%) 13–11 (54%) 95.5 -0.52
31 2015 1813 155.6 -2.84 +3.06 1.012 50.2% +34 +69 -157 51.0% +0.17 7–6 (54%) 3–11 (21%) 95.2 -0.21 2013 1863 155.8 -0.38 +1.63 1.020 50.1% +13 -119 -42 52.3% +0.05 3–10 (23%) 14–10 (58%) 95.0 -0.69
32 2016 1875 154.8 -1.63 +3.93 1.056 50.7% -44 +70 — 52.2% +0.15 4–1 (80%) 4–6 (40%) 102.4 -1.33 2014 1895 157.3 +1.28 +0.40 1.026 50.6% +48 -215 -117 52.1% +0.21 9–9 (50%) 6–14 (30%) 93.2 +1.35
33 2017 1814 105.4 -2.73 -1.34 0.827 45.7% — — — 14.3% -2.00 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.13 2015 1800 109.3 -0.93 -2.34 0.783 45.6% +20 — — 25.0% -1.50 — 1–1 — +0.34
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1806 142.3 -0.03 -1.08 0.950 48.8% -5 — -45 39.7% -0.60 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) 97.5 -0.94
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1863 143.0 +1.12 +0.87 1.046 50.7% +23 — -101 50.8% +0.16 4–5 (44%) 4–6 (40%) 99.1 -0.93
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1807 131.6 -2.07 -0.63 0.869 47.5% -15 -176 +4 45.6% -0.58 1–2 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 101.1 -0.81
Career — 2053 154.7 -0.99 +3.80 1.069 51.1% -64 +97 -261 54.1% +0.29 92–89 (51%) 90–105 (46%) 96.3 +0.33 — 1960 148.1 -0.48 +0.63 0.977 49.5% +9 -103 -115 48.0% -0.19 86–96 (47%) 114–111 (51%) 99.8 -1.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.