H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Juan Monaco vs Paolo Lorenzi H2H: 1-1

Juan Monaco and Paolo Lorenzi are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paolo Lorenzi leads 1–0 on clay, while Juan Monaco leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2014 Moscow round of 32 6-3 5-7 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Juan Monaco
ARG Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Paolo Lorenzi
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Juan Monaco #70 6-3 5-7 6-3 Paolo Lorenzi #73 Match data Oct 16, 2014* R32 Moscow ATP 250 Hard
Paolo Lorenzi #114 7-6(6) 6-7(4) 6-4 Juan Monaco #43 Match data Mar 1, 2014* QF Sao Paulo ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Juan Monaco #226 #10 2,775 2,052 327 260 55.7% 0 0 0 2 7 9
Paolo Lorenzi #1,033 #33 1,223 1,823 105 181 36.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Juan Monaco Paolo Lorenzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2004 16–12 57.1% #73 1,661 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2005 18–25 41.9% #85 1,577 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2006 18–23 43.9% #69 1,639 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2007 41–19 68.3% #23 1,864 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 2008 27–21 56.2% #46 1,760 0 3 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,503 0 0
25 2009 34–24 58.6% #30 1,851 0 3 2007 1–1 50.0% #294 1,492 0 0
26 2010 28–18 60.9% #26 1,837 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2011 26–24 52.0% #26 1,940 0 3 2009 0–1 0.0% #84 1,437 0 0
28 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,935 0 7 2010 2–14 12.5% #143 1,435 0 0
29 2013 22–21 51.2% #42 1,822 0 8 2011 2–3 40.0% #108 1,516 0 0
30 2014 22–19 53.7% #62 1,864 0 8 2012 8–17 32.0% #64 1,604 0 0
31 2015 21–19 52.5% #53 1,812 0 8 2013 13–24 35.1% #109 1,646 0 0
32 2016 17–14 54.8% #65 1,875 0 9 2014 11–14 44.0% #64 1,663 0 0
33 2017 0–3 0.0% #226 1,814 0 9 2015 7–18 28.0% #68 1,615 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2016 24–25 49.0% #40 1,793 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2017 24–32 42.9% #43 1,700 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2018 6–15 28.6% #109 1,632 0 1
37 — — — — — — — 2019 6–10 37.5% #115 1,628 0 1
38 — — — — — — — 2020 1–4 20.0% #146 1,536 0 1
39 — — — — — — — 2021 0–2 0.0% #274 1,493 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Juan Monaco Paolo Lorenzi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2004 2 3 5 40.0% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 1 8 9 11.1% 14 14 28 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 3 8 11 27.3% 15 15 30 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 12 9 21 57.1% 28 8 36 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 9 10 19 47.4% 18 10 28 64.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 7 10 17 41.2% 27 13 40 67.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2010 14 10 24 58.3% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 15 12 27 55.6% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 22 6 28 78.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2010 0 6 6 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2013 2 7 9 22.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2014 7 7 14 50.0% 15 12 27 55.6% — — — — — — — — 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
31 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2016 6 7 13 46.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 3 7 10 30.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 10 12 22 45.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 9 17 26 34.6% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 3 4 7 42.9% 2 9 11 18.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 96 108 204 47.1% 220 136 356 61.8% 7 11 18 38.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — 43 79 122 35.2% 57 81 138 41.3% 5 21 26 19.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 578/587 of Juan Monaco's and 283/286 of Paolo Lorenzi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Juan Monaco Paolo Lorenzi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2004 28/28 1.9 2.5 66.9% 63.4% 48.9% 47.3% 47.8% 58.5% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 42/43 2.0 2.1 65.5% 63.7% 50.7% 51.2% 43.6% 58.9% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 41/41 1.9 1.8 64.0% 65.6% 52.2% 56.6% 40.4% 60.9% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 60/60 3.2 1.9 65.2% 69.0% 56.6% 57.3% 50.6% 64.7% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 46/48 2.7 1.9 64.8% 65.5% 51.6% 50.7% 43.9% 60.1% 41.8% 2006 1/1 0.0 1.0 53.3% 42.5% 48.6% 41.7% 37.5% 45.3% 40.0%
25 2009 58/58 1.9 2.0 68.0% 66.6% 53.2% 52.0% 48.6% 62.4% 42.9% 2007 2/2 0.5 3.0 66.3% 62.4% 44.0% 46.4% 60.0% 55.5% 27.5%
26 2010 46/46 3.4 2.5 65.3% 68.0% 52.0% 58.2% 45.8% 62.4% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 49/50 2.0 1.9 66.1% 66.1% 52.9% 57.1% 46.6% 61.4% 40.7% 2009 1/1 2.0 2.0 54.3% 64.0% 28.6% 33.3% — 47.8% 17.9%
28 2012 53/55 1.7 2.0 67.7% 67.4% 52.8% 55.8% 45.5% 62.4% 43.2% 2010 16/16 4.1 4.3 61.0% 64.7% 44.6% 56.6% 27.2% 56.9% 33.2%
29 2013 43/43 2.0 1.9 69.0% 65.2% 52.2% 50.8% 49.4% 61.4% 42.4% 2011 5/5 1.8 2.8 65.2% 66.1% 42.6% 51.9% 38.0% 57.9% 36.6%
30 2014 41/41 1.9 1.6 69.8% 64.7% 54.8% 49.0% 45.9% 61.7% 41.1% 2012 25/25 2.6 2.0 61.5% 63.8% 48.2% 50.5% 34.3% 57.8% 34.1%
31 2015 40/40 2.2 1.4 71.9% 64.4% 51.7% 59.5% 41.9% 60.6% 39.9% 2013 37/37 2.9 2.3 57.2% 67.7% 49.8% 52.7% 36.3% 60.1% 36.2%
32 2016 28/31 1.9 1.1 74.5% 64.0% 55.4% 54.8% 39.6% 61.4% 40.7% 2014 25/25 3.8 2.1 57.6% 70.1% 48.9% 60.1% 48.5% 61.1% 39.9%
33 2017 3/3 0.7 0.7 63.6% 60.5% 47.8% 52.2% 59.5% 55.8% 36.6% 2015 25/25 4.2 2.6 56.5% 66.9% 49.3% 51.8% 40.9% 58.6% 31.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 47/49 4.0 2.6 56.3% 69.0% 48.1% 55.5% 43.8% 60.0% 37.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 55/56 4.5 2.8 58.5% 69.4% 52.7% 56.4% 38.4% 62.3% 34.9%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 21/21 5.4 3.4 57.6% 71.0% 45.0% 61.9% 37.0% 59.9% 33.1%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 16/16 5.0 3.3 60.6% 71.1% 51.4% 67.4% 45.2% 63.4% 30.6%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 2.8 3.0 56.9% 67.8% 43.1% 48.1% 24.2% 57.0% 33.4%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 2/2 2.5 2.5 61.3% 61.1% 32.2% 58.3% 50.0% 49.3% 25.6%
Career — 578/587 2.2 1.9 67.3% 65.9% 52.8% 54.1% 45.8% 61.5% 41.1% — 283/286 3.9 2.7 58.3% 68.1% 48.8% 55.8% 39.3% 60.0% 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Juan Monaco Paolo Lorenzi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2004 1662 138.6 -2.03 +3.31 1.009 50.1% -131 +91 — 51.5% +0.16 6–3 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.7 -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 1577 124.6 -2.76 -0.23 0.912 48.2% -97 +112 — 42.0% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 5–9 (36%) 94.3 +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1640 125.6 -0.75 +2.74 1.032 50.5% -158 +76 — 46.7% -0.17 3–8 (27%) 5–6 (45%) 94.7 -1.40 2004 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 1865 145.9 +1.71 +3.90 1.166 52.7% -172 +120 — 60.6% +0.84 16–6 (73%) 7–12 (37%) 106.6 +0.58 2005 1469 94.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 1760 137.9 -2.43 +3.95 1.049 50.9% -60 +159 — 55.5% +0.11 7–7 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 98.3 +1.07 2006 1504 104.3 +3.27 -1.79 0.732 42.8% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — -0.08
25 2009 1852 157.8 -0.30 +5.86 1.140 52.3% -132 +156 — 57.5% +0.53 6–8 (43%) 7–8 (47%) 96.0 -2.94 2007 1493 97.8 -0.64 -3.08 0.618 43.5% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 1–1 — -0.04
26 2010 1838 151.8 -0.23 +3.49 1.081 51.6% -17 +79 — 58.8% +0.54 9–8 (53%) 12–6 (67%) 104.1 +2.65 2008 1459 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 1940 155.8 -0.55 +4.02 1.054 50.7% +9 -75 — 51.3% +0.12 7–9 (44%) 8–9 (47%) 99.2 -0.04 2009 1438 104.3 -4.82 +0.04 0.344 34.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
28 2012 1936 158.3 -0.31 +5.86 1.150 52.6% -29 +125 -371 62.2% +0.75 12–7 (63%) 11–7 (61%) 106.1 +2.18 2010 1435 112.9 -3.79 -3.23 0.770 45.2% +6 +72 +28 20.0% -1.85 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 97.7 -0.07
29 2013 1822 149.5 -1.37 +4.76 1.098 51.6% -49 +142 -201 54.3% +0.49 4–10 (29%) 5–10 (33%) 86.9 +2.05 2011 1517 125.6 -0.71 +1.76 0.870 47.1% -1 — — 45.5% -1.00 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.31
30 2014 1864 149.5 -1.50 +3.48 1.073 51.0% -49 +48 — 52.9% +0.15 7–9 (44%) 9–9 (50%) 97.7 +0.07 2012 1604 133.1 -3.58 -1.74 0.808 45.7% -7 -40 -150 33.9% -1.24 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 101.5 -0.29
31 2015 1813 155.6 -2.84 +3.06 1.012 50.2% +34 +69 -157 51.0% +0.17 7–6 (54%) 3–11 (21%) 95.2 -0.21 2013 1647 139.6 -1.95 -1.10 0.906 48.1% -26 -59 -191 36.5% -0.84 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 -0.92
32 2016 1875 154.8 -1.63 +3.93 1.056 50.7% -44 +70 — 52.2% +0.15 4–1 (80%) 4–6 (40%) 102.4 -1.33 2014 1664 133.8 -1.37 +1.94 1.025 50.4% -26 +44 -207 42.1% -0.40 2–6 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 +0.70
33 2017 1814 105.4 -2.73 -1.34 0.827 45.7% — — — 14.3% -2.00 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.13 2015 1615 126.4 -3.80 -3.71 0.748 45.0% +9 +14 — 31.7% -0.88 5–2 (71%) 2–8 (20%) 98.7 +0.18
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1793 148.1 -2.03 -0.06 0.925 48.8% -53 -16 -398 46.8% -0.22 11–6 (65%) 10–11 (48%) 108.4 +1.05
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1701 139.0 -1.35 -1.16 0.925 48.8% -33 +63 -290 45.9% -0.32 8–11 (42%) 15–16 (48%) 96.7 +2.90
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1632 123.3 -2.86 -2.73 0.824 47.1% +52 -8 -190 35.7% -0.70 0–4 (0%) 5–7 (42%) 94.8 +0.77
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1629 124.6 -0.47 -3.08 0.836 47.5% +77 -70 — 37.0% -0.67 5–3 (63%) 7–10 (41%) 101.2 +1.08
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1537 109.2 -1.98 -0.85 0.778 45.2% +108 — — 16.7% -1.67 1–0 0–1 — +0.68
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1494 93.1 -2.75 -1.01 0.505 38.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.30
Career — 2053 154.7 -0.99 +3.80 1.069 51.1% -64 +97 -261 54.1% +0.29 92–89 (51%) 90–105 (46%) 96.3 +0.33 — 1824 134.2 -2.16 -1.27 0.869 47.5% -9 +4 -201 38.6% -0.71 41–46 (47%) 51–71 (42%) 98.6 +2.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.