H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Julian Alonso vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 0-2

Hicham Arazi holds a 2–0 lead over Julian Alonso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 2000 Australian Open round of 128 6-3 7-6(6) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julian Alonso
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Hicham Arazi
MAR Age 52 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hicham Arazi #41 6-3 7-6(6) 6-2 Julian Alonso #111 Match data Jan 19, 2000* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Hicham Arazi #52 6-3 4-6 6-3 Julian Alonso #201 Match data Apr 17, 1997* R32 Barcelona Open Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julian Alonso #1,269 #30 1,113 1,702 50 64 43.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Hicham Arazi #793 #22 1,240 1,864 202 215 48.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julian Alonso Hicham Arazi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 0–2 0.0% #227 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 21–11 65.6% #36 1,702 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1998 16–31 34.0% #103 1,559 0 2 1994 0–1 0.0% #184 1,486 0 0
21 1999 9–11 45.0% #112 1,591 0 2 1995 1–5 16.7% #141 1,457 0 0
22 2000 4–9 30.8% #170 1,543 0 2 1996 12–17 41.4% #79 1,546 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1997 28–27 50.9% #38 1,624 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 1998 23–28 45.1% #36 1,715 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1999 27–27 50.0% #36 1,702 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2000 31–26 54.4% #30 1,775 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2001 30–23 56.6% #25 1,833 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2002 14–21 40.0% #90 1,699 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2003 21–20 51.2% #52 1,718 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2004 15–18 45.5% #62 1,701 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2005 0–2 0.0% #897 1,664 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julian Alonso Hicham Arazi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 5 3 8 62.5% 15 7 22 68.2% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 3 13 16 18.8% 13 16 29 44.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2000 0 4 4 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 1996 5 9 14 35.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 19 14 33 57.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 17 13 30 56.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 17 15 32 53.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 12 9 21 57.1% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 10 8 18 55.6% 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 7 8 15 46.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 9 22 31 29.0% 40 38 78 51.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — 80 87 167 47.9% 77 84 161 47.8% 18 17 35 51.4% 27 27 54 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julian Alonso Hicham Arazi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1485 105.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1703 138.3 — — — — -90 +22 — 56.8% +0.63 11–3 (79%) 3–6 (33%) 108.0 +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 1560 120.5 — — — — -57 +95 — 36.0% -0.89 6–9 (40%) 6–11 (35%) 94.4 +0.24 1994 1487 97.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.09
21 1999 1591 119.4 — — — — -77 +90 — 43.1% -0.71 4–3 (57%) 5–3 (63%) 101.9 +0.71 1995 1457 106.7 — — — — +66 — — 29.4% -1.30 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 +0.11
22 2000 1544 113.2 — — — — -93 +111 — 31.0% -0.93 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 103.3 -0.02 1996 1546 121.8 — — — — +2 -25 +68 41.3% -0.65 7–6 (54%) 5–7 (42%) 103.3 +0.69
23 2001 1537 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1625 136.9 — — — — -45 +82 -20 50.4% -0.07 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 105.0 +0.56
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1716 146.6 — — — — -39 +16 -91 49.6% 0.00 5–11 (31%) 6–10 (38%) 94.1 -3.26
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1702 141.7 — — — — -21 +82 — 47.4% -0.41 9–5 (64%) 14–8 (64%) 107.1 -3.32
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1775 143.8 — — — — +25 -55 -150 53.7% +0.23 12–7 (63%) 5–10 (33%) 103.1 +0.15
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1834 144.1 — — — — +20 -121 -176 53.4% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 16–9 (64%) 106.4 -0.90
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1700 126.9 — — — — +97 -76 — 46.7% -0.31 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 95.0 -0.75
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1718 135.5 -0.40 +1.29 1.017 50.1% +50 -87 -83 51.0% +0.17 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 101.0 +0.03
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1702 135.1 -0.45 +0.35 0.986 49.8% +29 -110 +6 46.0% -0.25 3–6 (33%) 7–9 (44%) 95.1 -0.40
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1665 97.8 -2.62 -3.75 0.527 39.2% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.02
Career — 1703 127.4 — — — — -73 +75 — 42.4% -0.45 24–16 (60%) 16–23 (41%) 103.1 +1.25 — 1865 143.4 -0.48 +0.75 0.987 49.7% +14 -4 -63 48.9% -0.15 65–63 (51%) 79–72 (52%) 104.2 -1.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.