H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Julian Alonso vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 0-2
Hicham Arazi holds a 2–0 lead over Julian Alonso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 2000 Australian Open first round 6-3 7-6(6) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Hicham Arazi | 6-3 7-6(6) 6-2 | Julian Alonso | Match data |
| Apr 17, 1997* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Hicham Arazi | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Julian Alonso | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julian Alonso | #1,269 | #30 | 1,113 | 1,698 | 50 | 65 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julian Alonso | Hicham Arazi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| -10 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #227 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #36 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 16–31 | 34.0% | #103 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #112 | 1,590 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #170 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |