H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Julian Alonso vs John Van Lottum H2H: 0-1

John Van Lottum holds a 1–0 lead over Julian Alonso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, John Van Lottum leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Van Lottum won the 1998 New Haven round of 64 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Julian Alonso
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
John Van Lottum
NED Age 50 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Van Lottum 6-4 6-2 Julian Alonso #49 Match data Aug 19, 1998* R64 New Haven ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julian Alonso #1,269 #30 1,113 1,702 50 64 43.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
John Van Lottum — — — 1,719 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julian Alonso John Van Lottum
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 0–2 0.0% #227 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1997 21–11 65.6% #36 1,702 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1998 16–31 34.0% #103 1,559 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 1999 9–11 45.0% #112 1,591 0 2 — — — — — — —
22 2000 4–9 30.8% #170 1,543 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julian Alonso John Van Lottum
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 5 3 8 62.5% 15 7 22 68.2% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 3 13 16 18.8% 13 16 29 44.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
22 2000 0 4 4 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 1998 3 6 9 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 17 13 30 56.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 3 6 9 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 6 8 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 9 22 31 29.0% 40 38 78 51.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — 30 46 76 39.5% 13 27 40 32.5% 13 15 28 46.4% 4 7 11 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julian Alonso John Van Lottum
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1485 105.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1997 1703 138.3 — — — — -90 +22 — 56.8% +0.63 11–3 (79%) 3–6 (33%) 108.0 +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1998 1560 120.5 — — — — -57 +95 — 36.0% -0.89 6–9 (40%) 6–11 (35%) 94.4 +0.24 1996 1491 106.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.35
21 1999 1591 119.4 — — — — -77 +90 — 43.1% -0.71 4–3 (57%) 5–3 (63%) 101.9 +0.71 1997 1631 121.6 — — — — -56 -46 +18 64.5% +0.77 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.2 -0.05
22 2000 1544 113.2 — — — — -93 +111 — 31.0% -0.93 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 103.3 -0.02 1998 1612 120.7 — — — — -50 -79 +129 40.7% -0.59 5–3 (63%) 3–7 (30%) 101.6 +0.05
23 2001 1537 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1662 128.3 — — — — +36 -181 +3 49.1% -0.33 6–6 (50%) 13–3 (81%) 107.6 +1.68
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1517 104.0 — — — — +57 — — 18.5% -2.33 0–2 0–2 — +0.38
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1584 111.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.87 0–1 1–1 — -0.48
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1624 118.0 — — — — -2 -68 — 50.0% -0.30 0–1 1–1 — +0.19
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1599 123.9 -1.54 -1.36 0.912 48.4% -3 +14 -27 46.7% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 +0.37
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1512 123.3 -1.67 -2.93 0.813 47.0% +60 +41 +27 37.5% -1.07 0–6 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 96.3 -0.92
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1511 103.1 +0.34 +3.36 0.751 46.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.12
Career — 1703 127.4 — — — — -73 +75 — 42.4% -0.45 24–16 (60%) 16–23 (41%) 103.1 +1.25 — 1719 126.6 -1.54 -1.86 0.869 47.8% +15 -52 +48 43.0% -0.64 15–25 (38%) 27–20 (57%) 100.9 +0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.