H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Julian Alonso vs Renzo Furlan H2H: 1-0

Julian Alonso holds a 1–0 lead over Renzo Furlan in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julian Alonso leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julian Alonso won the 1998 Australian Open round of 128 7-6(9) 6-2 2-6 6-2.

ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
ITA Age 56 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julian Alonso #36 7-6(9) 6-2 2-6 6-2 Renzo Furlan #100 Match data Jan 21, 1998* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Julian Alonso #1,269 #30 1,113 1,702 50 64 43.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Renzo Furlan #1,479 #19 1,235 1,864 214 233 47.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Julian Alonso Renzo Furlan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1996 0–2 0.0% #227 1,485 0 0
19 1997 21–11 65.6% #36 1,702 0 1 1989 3–5 37.5% #222 1,500 0 0
20 1998 16–31 34.0% #103 1,559 0 2 1990 9–8 52.9% #77 1,597 0 0
21 1999 9–11 45.0% #112 1,591 0 2 1991 22–26 45.8% #52 1,664 0 0
22 2000 4–9 30.8% #170 1,543 0 2 1992 26–29 47.3% #53 1,682 0 0
23 1993 26–28 48.1% #72 1,682 0 0
24 1994 30–27 52.6% #41 1,664 0 2
25 1995 37–31 54.4% #29 1,729 0 2
26 1996 32–27 54.2% #40 1,706 0 2
27 1997 18–27 40.0% #100 1,581 0 2
28 1998 2–8 20.0% #144 1,514 0 2
29 1999 3–5 37.5% #225 1,542 0 2
30 2000 3–4 42.9% #236 1,569 0 2
31 2001 1–1 50.0% #190 1,554 0 2
32 2002 1–3 25.0% #186 1,540 0 2
33 2003 1–4 20.0% #194 1,547 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Julian Alonso Renzo Furlan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1996 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1997 5 3 8 62.5% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 3 5 8 37.5%
20 1998 3 13 16 18.8% 13 16 29 44.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 9 8 17 52.9%
21 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 1 7 8 12.5% 20 17 37 54.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2000 0 4 4 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1992 0 7 7 0.0% 25 20 45 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 23 21 44 52.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1994 10 7 17 58.8% 17 16 33 51.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1995 17 10 27 63.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
26 1996 17 13 30 56.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
27 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
28 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 1999 3 5 8 37.5%
30 2000 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 2001 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 9 22 31 29.0% 40 38 78 51.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 55 68 123 44.7% 127 128 255 49.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 29 31 60 48.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Julian Alonso Renzo Furlan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1996 1485 105.6 0.0% -3.00 0–1 -0.20
19 1997 1703 138.3 -90 +22 56.8% +0.63 11–3 (79%) 3–6 (33%) 108.0 +0.69 1989 1501 106.7 +10 35.0% -0.45 2–0 0–3 (0%) +0.66
20 1998 1560 120.5 -57 +95 36.0% -0.89 6–9 (40%) 6–11 (35%) 94.4 +0.24 1990 1598 130.3 +44 50.0% -0.03 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -0.03
21 1999 1591 119.4 -77 +90 43.1% -0.71 4–3 (57%) 5–3 (63%) 101.9 +0.71 1991 1664 137.7 -2.73 +1.94 0.994 49.8% -177 +91 47.1% -0.41 8–12 (40%) 12–4 (75%) 105.4 +0.30
22 2000 1544 113.2 -93 +111 31.0% -0.93 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 103.3 -0.02 1992 1682 140.0 -1.77 +2.85 1.025 50.4% -235 +91 47.4% +0.01 8–10 (44%) 3–8 (27%) 96.1 -0.66
23 2001 1537 101.1 1993 1683 138.8 -0.24 +0.57 0.985 49.6% -226 +82 48.0% -0.09 7–8 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 98.6 +0.10
24 1994 1665 140.9 -0.31 +2.54 1.038 50.5% -28 +39 48.9% +0.01 13–10 (57%) 11–9 (55%) 105.7 +0.67
25 1995 1729 142.6 -0.32 +0.37 0.982 49.7% +21 -5 51.8% +0.17 14–3 (82%) 9–14 (39%) 105.7 +0.88
26 1996 1706 139.0 +0.16 +1.18 1.029 50.3% -16 +54 -123 51.0% +0.01 14–7 (67%) 11–11 (50%) 105.1 -0.21
27 1997 1582 130.5 +0.90 -1.60 0.981 49.4% +41 +103 42.6% -0.40 9–10 (47%) 14–12 (54%) 100.5 +1.02
28 1998 1514 109.9 -1.66 -1.48 0.763 46.0% +69 +109 32.1% -1.21 2–4 (33%) 0–2 +0.35
29 1999 1542 115.4 -3.93 -1.08 0.680 42.1% +87 33.3% -1.83 2–0 3–0 (100%) -0.45
30 2000 1569 111.4 -1.39 -1.97 0.838 47.4% +18 +59 41.2% -0.94 2–1 (67%) 1–1 +0.23
31 2001 1555 106.0 -2.11 +1.56 0.881 47.7% 50.0% -0.25 +0.18
32 2002 1540 109.9 -1.86 -0.38 0.813 46.7% 33.3% -0.56 0–1 1–1 +0.32
33 2003 1548 103.2 -1.68 -0.29 0.984 49.5% +59 10.0% -2.50 0–1 +0.07
Career 1703 127.4 -73 +75 42.4% -0.45 24–16 (60%) 16–23 (41%) 103.1 +1.25 1865 140.8 -0.75 +0.99 0.987 49.7% -29 +67 -123 47.0% -0.18 84–67 (56%) 74–76 (49%) 104.6 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.