H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Julien Benneteau vs Jan Hernych H2H: 0-2
Jan Hernych holds a 2–0 lead over Julien Benneteau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jan Hernych leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan Hernych won the 2009 Canada Masters second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2009* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jan Hernych | 6-2 6-3 | Julien Benneteau | Match data |
| Apr 19, 2006* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Jan Hernych | 7-6(9) 4-6 7-6(4) | Julien Benneteau | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julien Benneteau | #140 | #25 | 1,608 | 1,955 | 269 | 292 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan Hernych | #1,606 | #59 | 1,157 | 1,780 | 79 | 115 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julien Benneteau | Jan Hernych | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #138 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #165 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #40 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #74 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #156 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #113 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #168 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2014 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #25 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #193 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #527 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,862 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #140 | 1,806 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #424 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |