H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Julien Benneteau vs Robby Ginepri H2H: 1-1
Julien Benneteau and Robby Ginepri are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Julien Benneteau won the 2009 Brisbane third round 3-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2009* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Julien Benneteau | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | Robby Ginepri | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2006* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Robby Ginepri | 3-6 6-4 6-4 6-4 | Julien Benneteau | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julien Benneteau | #140 | #25 | 1,608 | 1,955 | 269 | 292 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Robby Ginepri | #1,221 | #15 | 1,525 | 1,927 | 185 | 194 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julien Benneteau | Robby Ginepri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #138 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #15 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2005 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #165 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #40 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #134 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2007 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #100 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2009 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2011 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2012 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #223 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2014 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #25 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #527 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,862 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #140 | 1,806 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |