H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Julien Benneteau vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 1-0
Julien Benneteau holds a 1–0 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julien Benneteau leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julien Benneteau won the 2005 Miami Masters first round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2005* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Julien Benneteau | 6-0 6-3 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julien Benneteau | #140 | #25 | 1,608 | 1,955 | 269 | 292 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julien Benneteau | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #138 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #165 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #40 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2007 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2009 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2011 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2012 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2014 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #25 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #527 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,862 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #140 | 1,806 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |