H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Julien Benneteau vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 1-3
Sergiy Stakhovsky holds a 3–1 lead over Julien Benneteau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sergiy Stakhovsky won the 2017 Wimbledon first round 6-3 7-6(8) 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-3 7-6(8) 2-6 6-2 | Julien Benneteau | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2014* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-3 6-2 | Julien Benneteau | Match data |
| Aug 26, 2011* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Julien Benneteau | 3-6 7-6(9) 6-2 | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Mar 27, 2010* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-3 7-6(5) | Julien Benneteau | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julien Benneteau | #140 | #25 | 1,608 | 1,955 | 269 | 292 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Julien Benneteau | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #138 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #165 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #40 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2007 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2009 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2011 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2012 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #25 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #527 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,862 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #140 | 1,806 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |