H2H data updated: 2026-07-21 07:16 UTC
Julien Benneteau vs Teymuraz Gabashvili H2H: 1-0
Julien Benneteau holds a 1–0 lead over Teymuraz Gabashvili in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julien Benneteau leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julien Benneteau won the 2007 Chennai third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2007* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Julien Benneteau | 6-3 6-4 | Teymuraz Gabashvili | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julien Benneteau | #140 | #25 | 1,608 | 1,955 | 269 | 292 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Teymuraz Gabashvili | #1,373 | #43 | 1,226 | 1,836 | 109 | 194 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julien Benneteau | Teymuraz Gabashvili | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #138 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–28 | 26.3% | #125 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #165 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #40 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #80 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #138 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #182 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #50 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #138 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2014 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #25 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #527 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,862 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #140 | 1,806 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |