H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Julien Benneteau vs Vasek Pospisil H2H: 1-0
Julien Benneteau holds a 1–0 lead over Vasek Pospisil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julien Benneteau leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julien Benneteau won the 2015 Sydney fourth round 7-6(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 36
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2015* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Julien Benneteau | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Vasek Pospisil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julien Benneteau | #140 | #25 | 1,608 | 1,955 | 269 | 292 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vasek Pospisil | #1,265 | #25 | 1,359 | 1,958 | 122 | 161 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Julien Benneteau | Vasek Pospisil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #138 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #119 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #165 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #40 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #133 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #108 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #61 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2014 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #25 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #98 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #527 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #733 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,862 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1265 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #140 | 1,806 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |