H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jurgen Fassbender vs Charlie Pasarell H2H: 2-1
Jurgen Fassbender holds a 2–1 lead over Charlie Pasarell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jurgen Fassbender leads 2–0 on clay, while Charlie Pasarell leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jurgen Fassbender won the 1976 Roland Garros second round 6-2 6-7 7-6 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 78
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 82
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 1976* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Jurgen Fassbender | 6-2 6-7 7-6 1-6 6-3 | Charlie Pasarell | Match data |
| Oct 28, 1975* | Tehran | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Jurgen Fassbender | 7-6 6-3 | Charlie Pasarell | Match data |
| Sep 28, 1975* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Charlie Pasarell | 6-3 7-6(6) | Jurgen Fassbender | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jurgen Fassbender | #618 | #31 | 0 | 1,868 | 170 | 167 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Charlie Pasarell | #312 | #35 | 0 | 1,939 | 302 | 275 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jurgen Fassbender | Charlie Pasarell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1968 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1969 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1970 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,409 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1971 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1972 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1973 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #46 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 43–31 | 58.1% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1974 | 41–30 | 57.7% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1975 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 26–32 | 44.8% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1976 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #64 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 40–31 | 56.3% | #47 | 1,834 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1978 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #151 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #51 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #242 | 1,627 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #63 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #482 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #56 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #200 | 1,607 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #312 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 |