H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jurgen Fassbender vs Cliff Richey H2H: 0-2
Cliff Richey holds a 2–0 lead over Jurgen Fassbender in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cliff Richey leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cliff Richey won the 1974 Tokyo fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 78
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 1974* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Cliff Richey | 6-3 6-2 | Jurgen Fassbender | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1974* | Maui | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Cliff Richey | 3-6 7-6 6-4 | Jurgen Fassbender | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jurgen Fassbender | #618 | #31 | 0 | 1,868 | 170 | 167 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Cliff Richey | #662 | #16 | 0 | 2,112 | 488 | 224 | 68.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jurgen Fassbender | Cliff Richey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1968 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1969 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 46–15 | 75.4% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1970 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,409 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 64–18 | 78.0% | — | 1,946 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 1971 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 88–24 | 78.6% | — | 2,047 | 0 | 14 |
| 24 | 1972 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 67–23 | 74.4% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 17 |
| 25 | 1973 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #46 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 20 |
| 26 | 1974 | 41–30 | 57.7% | #54 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 20 |
| 27 | 1975 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #23 | 1,891 | 0 | 21 |
| 28 | 1976 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #93 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,855 | 0 | 21 |
| 29 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #64 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #28 | 1,848 | 0 | 22 |
| 30 | 1978 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #151 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #97 | 1,714 | 0 | 22 |
| 31 | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #242 | 1,627 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #57 | 1,705 | 0 | 23 |
| 32 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #482 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,693 | 0 | 23 |