H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jurgen Fassbender vs Jaime Pinto Bravo H2H: 2-1

Jurgen Fassbender holds a 2–1 lead over Jaime Pinto Bravo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jurgen Fassbender leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jurgen Fassbender won the 1974 Munich Open round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jurgen Fassbender
GER Age 78 Right-Handed
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Jaime Pinto Bravo
CHI Age 86 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jurgen Fassbender #36 6-2 6-2 Jaime Pinto Bravo Match data May 18, 1974* R32 Munich Open ATP 250 Clay
Jurgen Fassbender 6-3 6-1 Jaime Pinto Bravo Match data Feb 7, 1974* R32 Little Rock ATP 250 Carpet
Jaime Pinto Bravo UNK Jurgen Fassbender Match data Feb 22, 1973* R32 Salisbury ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jurgen Fassbender #618 #31 0 1,888 183 167 52.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Jaime Pinto Bravo — — — 1,625 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jurgen Fassbender Jaime Pinto Bravo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1968 8–10 44.4% — 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1969 2–5 28.6% — 1,452 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1970 2–6 25.0% — 1,426 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1971 2–6 25.0% — 1,424 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1972 9–11 45.0% — 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1973 47–24 66.2% #46 1,739 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1974 41–30 57.7% #54 1,735 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 1975 28–25 52.8% #64 1,680 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1976 9–12 42.9% #93 1,662 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1977 21–21 50.0% #63 1,684 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1978 10–12 45.5% #151 1,671 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1979 4–5 44.4% #242 1,630 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jurgen Fassbender Jaime Pinto Bravo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1968 2 3 5 40.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1969 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1970 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1971 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1973 19 12 31 61.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1974 13 10 23 56.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 10 23 56.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1975 6 3 9 66.7% 14 13 27 51.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1976 2 3 5 40.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1968 — — — — 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — —
29 1977 4 7 11 36.4% 14 10 24 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1969 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
30 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 10 11 21 47.6% — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1979 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 3 10 13 23.1% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 5 12 17 29.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 9 10 10.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — 1 0 1 100.0% — — — — — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 46 40 86 53.5% 88 83 171 51.5% 17 19 36 47.2% 32 25 57 56.1% — 5 16 21 23.8% 49 73 122 40.2% 4 12 16 25.0% 1 13 14 7.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jurgen Fassbender Jaime Pinto Bravo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1968 1485 103.8 — — — — -17 +56 — 44.9% -0.45 1–3 (25%) — — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1969 1452 100.2 — — — — — +12 — 36.0% -0.80 1–2 (33%) — — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1970 1426 98.3 — — — — — +41 — 26.7% -1.47 — 0–2 — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1971 1424 108.2 — — — — — +51 — 41.9% -0.71 0–2 — — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1972 1631 121.0 — — — — — +9 -106 48.3% -0.25 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1973 1740 130.0 — — — — +16 -6 -112 61.6% +0.84 13–8 (62%) 4–7 (36%) 103.2 +7.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1974 1736 132.1 — — — — +5 +28 -65 56.6% +0.54 12–15 (44%) 10–10 (50%) 96.5 +4.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1975 1681 128.8 — — — — +35 +35 — 55.5% +0.13 8–11 (42%) 12–8 (60%) 98.5 +4.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1976 1662 124.0 — — — — +24 +51 — 48.1% -0.46 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 98.1 +0.19 1968 1540 107.1 — — — — — -12 — 51.2% -0.02 2–1 (67%) — — -0.50
29 1977 1684 129.0 — — — — -46 +78 -90 49.0% -0.44 8–6 (57%) 8–3 (73%) 103.8 +1.27 1969 1512 111.4 — — — — — -22 +34 30.0% -0.87 3–2 (60%) — — -0.46
30 1978 1671 125.2 — — — — — +46 — 47.6% -0.36 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 +0.04 1970 1487 106.9 — — — — — -38 — 20.0% -1.50 0–1 — — -0.41
31 1979 1630 98.1 — — — — +11 +12 — 44.4% -1.17 0–2 3–0 (100%) — +1.64 1971 1492 119.5 — — — — +50 -35 — 32.4% -1.15 0–1 1–1 — +0.05
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1558 121.1 — — — — — +14 -82 40.0% -0.67 5–2 (71%) 1–1 — -0.65
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1555 117.7 — — — — -75 +56 — 38.4% -0.85 5–11 (31%) 3–4 (43%) 96.4 +1.24
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1446 108.2 — — — — -71 +96 -30 28.6% -1.62 1–9 (10%) 3–5 (38%) 93.2 +1.80
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1506 124.1 — — — — — +61 — 43.5% -0.33 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 101.1 +2.27
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1556 127.6 — — — — — +43 — 41.9% -0.48 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — -0.04
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1602 118.1 — — — — — +23 — 40.9% -0.32 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.15
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1583 99.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.19
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1595 100.5 — — — — — — — 66.7% +0.67 1–0 — — +0.22
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1576 97.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.21
Career — 1888 129.4 — — — — +8 +37 -96 52.5% +0.06 52–57 (48%) 45–35 (56%) 99.8 +6.14 — 1625 122.7 — — — — -61 +33 -13 37.6% -0.82 24–37 (39%) 10–15 (40%) 96.8 +2.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.