H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Justin Gimelstob vs George Bastl H2H: 0-1
George Bastl holds a 1–0 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, George Bastl leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, George Bastl won the 2001 Memphis second round 1-6 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 51
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2005* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q3 | Grass | George Bastl | 1-0 (ret.) | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
| Feb 21, 2001* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | George Bastl | 1-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,721 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| George Bastl | #953 | #71 | 569 | 1,657 | 47 | 85 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Justin Gimelstob | George Bastl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #194 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #81 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #105 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #128 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #173 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #233 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |