H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Justin Gimelstob vs Jean-Rene Lisnard H2H: 0-1

Jean-Rene Lisnard holds a 1–0 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jean-Rene Lisnard leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jean-Rene Lisnard won the 2001 Marseille round of 32 7-6(5) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Justin Gimelstob
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jean-Rene Lisnard
MON Age 46 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jean-Rene Lisnard #210 7-6(5) 6-2 Justin Gimelstob #105 Match data Feb 15, 2001* R32 Marseille ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Justin Gimelstob #841 #63 733 1,722 107 171 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jean-Rene Lisnard #1,437 #84 478 1,693 41 79 34.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Justin Gimelstob Jean-Rene Lisnard
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 1–1 50.0% — 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1996 3–9 25.0% #152 1,510 0 0 1999 1–2 33.3% #138 1,498 0 0
20 1997 17–23 42.5% #104 1,630 0 0 2000 1–6 14.3% #194 1,465 0 0
21 1998 14–15 48.3% #80 1,661 0 0 2001 2–3 40.0% #264 1,542 0 0
22 1999 17–26 39.5% #82 1,645 0 0 2002 5–5 50.0% #105 1,634 0 0
23 2000 14–16 46.7% #97 1,675 0 0 2003 16–19 45.7% #97 1,644 0 0
24 2001 3–12 20.0% #177 1,595 0 0 2004 4–13 23.5% #132 1,529 0 0
25 2002 5–6 45.5% #106 1,619 0 0 2005 9–19 32.1% #103 1,563 0 0
26 2003 9–17 34.6% #106 1,532 0 0 2006 1–5 16.7% #295 1,497 0 0
27 2004 1–5 16.7% #162 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2005 8–9 47.1% #104 1,595 0 0 2008 0–2 0.0% #218 1,478 0 0
29 2006 14–20 41.2% #86 1,606 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #200 1,564 0 0
30 2007 1–12 7.7% #556 1,537 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — 2011 1–2 33.3% #353 1,606 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2012 0–1 0.0% #1437 1,588 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Justin Gimelstob Jean-Rene Lisnard
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1999 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1997 15 16 31 48.4% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2000 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1999 13 16 29 44.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 1 1 2 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2000 10 9 19 52.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2003 9 10 19 47.4% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2001 2 10 12 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 2 6 8 25.0% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — —
25 2002 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2005 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2003 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2006 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2004 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2009 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 71 112 183 38.8% 8 17 25 32.0% 24 35 59 40.7% 4 7 11 36.4% — 21 37 58 36.2% 18 37 55 32.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 259/278 of Justin Gimelstob's and 94/95 of Jean-Rene Lisnard's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Justin Gimelstob Jean-Rene Lisnard
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1995 2/2 8.0 5.0 62.7% 69.5% 44.6% 68.1% 31.7% 59.4% 30.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 10/12 5.1 3.4 54.9% 73.3% 46.5% 41.8% 50.8% 61.4% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 36/40 6.0 5.8 58.7% 71.8% 44.8% 51.3% 37.8% 60.5% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 26/29 5.5 3.9 59.7% 72.6% 47.9% 55.6% 44.3% 62.5% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 37/43 6.9 3.9 60.4% 72.2% 47.6% 56.4% 39.5% 62.4% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 29/30 8.3 4.4 58.7% 73.7% 49.6% 57.8% 36.8% 63.2% 37.6% 2003 35/35 1.7 3.9 54.5% 63.7% 48.3% 52.6% 47.0% 56.1% 40.4%
24 2001 13/15 5.6 5.7 55.5% 71.2% 45.9% 45.8% 36.3% 59.8% 34.1% 2004 16/17 2.8 4.1 50.5% 65.7% 47.4% 53.0% 41.6% 57.2% 34.7%
25 2002 10/11 5.5 5.7 53.9% 69.8% 43.4% 49.0% 29.6% 57.9% 37.0% 2005 28/28 2.3 5.8 45.7% 68.2% 44.6% 48.0% 35.1% 55.4% 36.7%
26 2003 26/26 7.3 4.2 54.5% 73.8% 45.2% 63.5% 42.7% 60.7% 36.5% 2006 6/6 2.2 5.8 44.4% 68.8% 44.5% 49.6% 35.7% 55.2% 38.8%
27 2004 6/6 4.5 5.5 48.7% 73.2% 49.4% 40.7% 26.3% 60.7% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 17/17 11.4 4.9 56.8% 77.1% 52.2% 59.4% 40.1% 66.2% 35.8% 2008 2/2 2.5 4.0 56.6% 63.3% 43.7% 56.7% 75.0% 54.8% 30.5%
29 2006 34/34 7.0 2.9 56.6% 72.4% 47.8% 63.7% 36.2% 61.7% 34.9% 2009 3/3 4.3 4.0 47.3% 78.0% 42.4% 61.8% 61.0% 58.7% 40.8%
30 2007 13/13 4.3 4.8 57.1% 65.3% 43.1% 49.5% 26.4% 55.8% 29.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 3.3 3.7 49.8% 64.2% 42.0% 56.7% 36.3% 52.7% 39.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 1/1 0.0 0.0 54.8% 43.5% 42.1% 28.6% 100.0% 42.9% 33.3%
Career — 259/278 6.8 4.4 57.4% 72.4% 47.1% 55.6% 38.2% 61.5% 35.9% — 94/120 2.2 4.6 50.2% 65.9% 46.2% 51.4% 43.1% 55.9% 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Justin Gimelstob Jean-Rene Lisnard
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1995 1530 110.0 -1.36 +1.92 0.750 45.8% — — — 37.5% -0.63 1–0 — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1510 118.9 +0.13 +0.36 0.915 48.2% +28 — — 29.6% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -0.63 1999 1498 107.1 — — — — — +27 — 44.4% -0.67 0–1 1–1 — +0.03
20 1997 1630 134.5 -1.35 -0.78 0.909 48.5% +30 — -55 43.3% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 10–8 (56%) 103.8 +0.60 2000 1465 112.4 — — — — +36 +36 — 26.3% -1.58 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 99.1 -0.53
21 1998 1661 129.0 +0.39 +1.22 1.052 50.8% -10 -75 -71 50.7% +0.12 6–8 (43%) 4–9 (31%) 96.0 -0.12 2001 1542 113.7 — — — — +20 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 -0.08
22 1999 1645 137.7 -0.21 -1.19 0.949 49.1% +36 -75 -122 45.0% -0.28 3–10 (23%) 7–12 (37%) 91.8 -1.22 2002 1634 120.0 — — — — — -69 — 39.1% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.53
23 2000 1675 126.8 +0.05 +0.25 1.022 50.4% +34 -174 -115 47.5% -0.40 5–7 (42%) 10–6 (63%) 99.6 +0.17 2003 1645 122.5 -4.08 +2.26 0.920 48.3% -3 -53 — 42.0% -0.50 6–3 (67%) 2–6 (25%) 100.3 -0.20
24 2001 1596 108.5 -1.35 -2.71 0.849 47.0% +17 — -76 29.3% -1.39 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.32 2004 1530 115.8 -3.69 -1.43 0.810 46.3% +54 +13 — 27.5% -1.40 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.0 -0.04
25 2002 1620 119.3 -1.95 +1.16 0.880 46.9% +9 — -59 40.7% -0.81 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.03 2005 1563 114.9 -5.59 -0.79 0.824 46.3% +73 -87 -54 31.0% -1.41 6–3 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 105.3 +1.49
26 2003 1532 117.2 -2.07 -0.87 0.929 48.9% +13 — +76 40.0% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 95.7 +1.70 2006 1497 105.4 -2.21 -1.43 0.866 47.1% +38 — — 25.0% -1.31 1–1 1–1 — +0.44
27 2004 1507 110.1 -0.55 -0.52 0.913 47.3% +4 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — -0.42 2007 1466 100.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1596 127.5 +2.04 +0.31 1.059 51.1% -56 — +71 48.9% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 6–7 (46%) 99.7 -0.05 2008 1479 108.2 -0.23 +0.42 0.675 44.4% — — — 16.7% -2.50 — 1–0 — -0.11
29 2006 1606 122.4 -0.69 -1.72 0.913 49.0% -77 -132 +106 44.9% -0.32 3–5 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 100.7 +0.54 2009 1565 111.7 -0.34 -2.05 0.988 50.5% — -1 — 37.5% -0.50 — — — +0.25
30 2007 1537 116.4 -4.94 -3.75 0.668 43.5% -37 — +128 10.0% -2.37 0–1 0–2 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1607 110.7 -1.16 -0.28 0.825 46.0% — — — 37.5% -1.13 — 1–1 — -0.05
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1589 99.6 -2.23 -3.42 0.583 38.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — 0.00
Career — 1722 132.5 -0.75 -0.68 0.933 48.8% +5 -103 -6 41.7% -0.51 35–56 (38%) 51–68 (43%) 92.8 +0.10 — 1694 120.5 -4.03 +0.17 0.858 47.1% +37 -33 -54 34.7% -1.02 18–16 (53%) 15–20 (43%) 100.6 +0.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.