H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Justin Gimelstob vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 0-2

Mark Woodforde holds a 2–0 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Woodforde leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1998 Wimbledon round of 64 2-6 6-1 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Justin Gimelstob
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Woodforde #49 2-6 6-1 6-4 6-4 Justin Gimelstob #113 Match data Jun 26, 1998* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Mark Woodforde #66 5-7 6-3 6-2 Justin Gimelstob #112 Match data Jun 10, 1998* R64 Queen's Club Championships ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Justin Gimelstob #841 #63 733 1,722 107 171 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,921 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Justin Gimelstob Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 1–1 50.0% — 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1996 3–9 25.0% #152 1,510 0 0 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1997 17–23 42.5% #104 1,630 0 0 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,547 0 1
21 1998 14–15 48.3% #80 1,661 0 0 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1999 17–26 39.5% #82 1,645 0 0 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,802 0 2
23 2000 14–16 46.7% #97 1,675 0 0 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,714 0 3
24 2001 3–12 20.0% #177 1,595 0 0 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,718 0 3
25 2002 5–6 45.5% #106 1,619 0 0 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,632 0 3
26 2003 9–17 34.6% #106 1,532 0 0 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,812 0 3
27 2004 1–5 16.7% #162 1,507 0 0 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 2005 8–9 47.1% #104 1,595 0 0 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 2006 14–20 41.2% #86 1,606 0 0 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,761 0 4
30 2007 1–12 7.7% #556 1,537 0 0 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,803 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,735 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,609 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,583 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Justin Gimelstob Mark Woodforde
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1997 15 16 31 48.4% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1986 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
21 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1999 13 16 29 44.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 23 10 33 69.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 2000 10 9 19 52.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1989 17 8 25 68.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2001 2 10 12 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2002 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1991 7 11 18 38.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2003 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1992 15 12 27 55.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 2004 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 15 12 27 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
28 2005 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1994 14 10 24 58.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5%
29 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0%
30 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 22 13 35 62.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 13 14 27 48.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 71 112 183 38.8% 8 17 25 32.0% 24 35 59 40.7% 4 7 11 36.4% — 179 153 332 53.9% 41 54 95 43.2% 48 43 91 52.7% 45 44 89 50.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 259/278 of Justin Gimelstob's and 380/434 of Mark Woodforde's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Justin Gimelstob Mark Woodforde
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1995 2/2 8.0 5.0 62.7% 69.5% 44.6% 68.1% 31.7% 59.4% 30.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 10/12 5.1 3.4 54.9% 73.3% 46.5% 41.8% 50.8% 61.4% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 36/40 6.0 5.8 58.7% 71.8% 44.8% 51.3% 37.8% 60.5% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 26/29 5.5 3.9 59.7% 72.6% 47.9% 55.6% 44.3% 62.5% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 37/43 6.9 3.9 60.4% 72.2% 47.6% 56.4% 39.5% 62.4% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 29/30 8.3 4.4 58.7% 73.7% 49.6% 57.8% 36.8% 63.2% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 13/15 5.6 5.7 55.5% 71.2% 45.9% 45.8% 36.3% 59.8% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 10/11 5.5 5.7 53.9% 69.8% 43.4% 49.0% 29.6% 57.9% 37.0% 1991 29/33 2.5 3.0 55.8% 65.5% 47.4% 50.6% 38.5% 57.4% 37.7%
26 2003 26/26 7.3 4.2 54.5% 73.8% 45.2% 63.5% 42.7% 60.7% 36.5% 1992 45/50 4.4 3.2 58.7% 72.6% 48.1% 59.0% 42.7% 62.7% 39.2%
27 2004 6/6 4.5 5.5 48.7% 73.2% 49.4% 40.7% 26.3% 60.7% 35.9% 1993 44/48 4.5 3.3 56.8% 71.9% 50.1% 65.2% 46.4% 62.2% 39.5%
28 2005 17/17 11.4 4.9 56.8% 77.1% 52.2% 59.4% 40.1% 66.2% 35.8% 1994 44/52 4.4 3.3 53.5% 72.9% 53.2% 58.2% 39.2% 63.6% 39.5%
29 2006 34/34 7.0 2.9 56.6% 72.4% 47.8% 63.7% 36.2% 61.7% 34.9% 1995 53/56 4.4 3.8 57.5% 72.8% 51.7% 55.9% 37.9% 63.5% 40.7%
30 2007 13/13 4.3 4.8 57.1% 65.3% 43.1% 49.5% 26.4% 55.8% 29.5% 1996 49/57 5.2 3.8 58.4% 73.8% 50.2% 65.5% 46.4% 64.0% 37.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 41/50 5.7 4.1 58.5% 71.7% 47.3% 60.7% 41.1% 61.2% 38.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 40/49 5.0 3.8 55.1% 73.1% 48.5% 58.7% 44.8% 62.1% 36.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 27/29 5.4 3.0 62.9% 67.2% 48.5% 57.7% 42.1% 59.9% 36.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 8/10 2.4 3.5 57.8% 64.1% 49.6% 52.0% 35.6% 58.2% 37.6%
Career — 259/278 6.8 4.4 57.4% 72.4% 47.1% 55.6% 38.2% 61.5% 35.9% — 380/607 4.6 3.5 57.3% 71.6% 49.7% 59.3% 42.1% 62.1% 38.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Justin Gimelstob Mark Woodforde
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1995 1530 110.0 -1.36 +1.92 0.750 45.8% — — — 37.5% -0.63 1–0 — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1510 118.9 +0.13 +0.36 0.915 48.2% +28 — — 29.6% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -0.63 1985 1579 111.5 — — — — -12 — +27 58.6% +0.41 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.8 +1.07
20 1997 1630 134.5 -1.35 -0.78 0.909 48.5% +30 — -55 43.3% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 10–8 (56%) 103.8 +0.60 1986 1547 116.0 — — — — +33 -49 +94 41.7% -0.80 3–3 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 102.1 +1.28
21 1998 1661 129.0 +0.39 +1.22 1.052 50.8% -10 -75 -71 50.7% +0.12 6–8 (43%) 4–9 (31%) 96.0 -0.12 1987 1648 124.1 — — — — +11 -154 -35 49.3% +0.15 6–5 (55%) 4–5 (44%) 101.9 +0.67
22 1999 1645 137.7 -0.21 -1.19 0.949 49.1% +36 -75 -122 45.0% -0.28 3–10 (23%) 7–12 (37%) 91.8 -1.22 1988 1802 150.3 — — — — +12 -238 -103 56.2% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 104.5 -2.00
23 2000 1675 126.8 +0.05 +0.25 1.022 50.4% +34 -174 -115 47.5% -0.40 5–7 (42%) 10–6 (63%) 99.6 +0.17 1989 1715 129.3 — — — — +66 -145 -42 53.1% +0.08 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) 99.1 +1.09
24 2001 1596 108.5 -1.35 -2.71 0.849 47.0% +17 — -76 29.3% -1.39 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.32 1990 1718 128.5 — — — — +12 — +3 50.0% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–5 (17%) 97.3 -0.18
25 2002 1620 119.3 -1.95 +1.16 0.880 46.9% +9 — -59 40.7% -0.81 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.03 1991 1633 130.1 -2.30 -0.49 0.885 47.4% +67 -69 — 36.9% -0.96 5–3 (63%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -1.26
26 2003 1532 117.2 -2.07 -0.87 0.929 48.9% +13 — +76 40.0% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 95.7 +1.70 1992 1813 146.1 +1.29 +1.66 1.050 50.8% +8 -233 -144 53.6% +0.17 6–10 (38%) 14–9 (61%) 101.0 -3.48
27 2004 1507 110.1 -0.55 -0.52 0.913 47.3% +4 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — -0.42 1993 1793 147.8 +1.20 +1.32 1.046 50.8% +19 -190 -121 56.7% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 100.4 -0.21
28 2005 1596 127.5 +2.04 +0.31 1.059 51.1% -56 — +71 48.9% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 6–7 (46%) 99.7 -0.05 1994 1793 144.0 +2.05 +1.57 1.087 51.3% +8 -106 -143 54.0% +0.28 7–4 (64%) 9–9 (50%) 101.3 -1.31
29 2006 1606 122.4 -0.69 -1.72 0.913 49.0% -77 -132 +106 44.9% -0.32 3–5 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 100.7 +0.54 1995 1761 143.4 +1.40 +2.84 1.115 51.5% -7 -71 -60 57.0% +0.31 6–9 (40%) 12–10 (55%) 96.4 -2.71
30 2007 1537 116.4 -4.94 -3.75 0.668 43.5% -37 — +128 10.0% -2.37 0–1 0–2 — -0.45 1996 1803 152.4 +2.11 +1.19 1.039 51.0% +37 -161 -119 53.2% +0.43 11–9 (55%) 11–14 (44%) 99.0 -3.08
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1736 142.0 -0.58 +1.92 0.993 49.9% +5 -6 +26 51.5% +0.08 6–10 (38%) 11–9 (55%) 98.9 -0.85
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1748 139.4 +0.21 -0.55 0.962 49.2% -9 -86 +48 52.0% +0.15 8–10 (44%) 7–10 (41%) 93.9 -0.36
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1610 125.8 -1.05 -0.14 0.914 48.2% +18 +2 +120 39.5% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–11 (27%) 93.5 -0.93
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1584 116.0 -0.30 +0.27 0.898 47.9% +5 — — 45.8% -0.29 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.24
Career — 1722 132.5 -0.75 -0.68 0.933 48.8% +5 -103 -6 41.7% -0.51 35–56 (38%) 51–68 (43%) 92.8 +0.10 — 1921 146.3 +0.70 +1.19 1.018 50.2% +18 -119 -13 51.6% +0.11 93–99 (48%) 111–116 (49%) 97.4 -2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.