H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Justin Gimelstob vs Neville Godwin H2H: 1-1

Justin Gimelstob and Neville Godwin are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Neville Godwin leads 1–0 on grass, while Justin Gimelstob leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Neville Godwin won the 1998 Newport quarterfinal 6-7(2) 7-6(6) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Justin Gimelstob
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Neville Godwin
RSA Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Neville Godwin #170 6-7(2) 7-6(6) 6-3 Justin Gimelstob #109 Match data Jul 11, 1998* QF Newport ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Justin Gimelstob #141 7-5 6-4 Neville Godwin #91 Match data Apr 11, 1997* R16 Hong Kong Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Justin Gimelstob #841 #63 733 1,722 107 171 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Neville Godwin #812 #90 515 1,669 34 51 40.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Justin Gimelstob Neville Godwin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1992 0–1 0.0% #487 1,484 0 0
18 1995 1–1 50.0% — 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1996 3–9 25.0% #152 1,510 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #275 1,468 0 0
20 1997 17–23 42.5% #104 1,630 0 0 1995 2–3 40.0% #208 1,475 0 0
21 1998 14–15 48.3% #80 1,661 0 0 1996 7–6 53.8% #111 1,594 0 0
22 1999 17–26 39.5% #82 1,645 0 0 1997 7–13 35.0% #180 1,548 0 0
23 2000 14–16 46.7% #97 1,675 0 0 1998 7–7 50.0% #150 1,581 0 0
24 2001 3–12 20.0% #177 1,595 0 0 1999 1–2 33.3% #210 1,567 0 0
25 2002 5–6 45.5% #106 1,619 0 0 2000 3–4 42.9% #123 1,615 0 0
26 2003 9–17 34.6% #106 1,532 0 0 2001 5–7 41.7% #128 1,578 0 1
27 2004 1–5 16.7% #162 1,507 0 0 2002 2–7 22.2% #207 1,488 0 1
28 2005 8–9 47.1% #104 1,595 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2006 14–20 41.2% #86 1,606 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2007 1–12 7.7% #556 1,537 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Justin Gimelstob Neville Godwin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 15 16 31 48.4% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1999 13 16 29 44.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 6 9 15 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2000 10 9 19 52.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1998 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 2001 2 10 12 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1999 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2002 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2003 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2001 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
27 2004 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
28 2005 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 71 112 183 38.8% 8 17 25 32.0% 24 35 59 40.7% 4 7 11 36.4% — 17 33 50 34.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 259/278 of Justin Gimelstob's and 71/85 of Neville Godwin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Justin Gimelstob Neville Godwin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 1/1 1.0 3.0 50.6% 74.4% 42.1% 66.7% 16.7% 58.4% 32.0%
18 1995 2/2 8.0 5.0 62.7% 69.5% 44.6% 68.1% 31.7% 59.4% 30.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 10/12 5.1 3.4 54.9% 73.3% 46.5% 41.8% 50.8% 61.4% 35.3% 1994 1/1 7.0 3.0 37.0% 70.6% 53.4% 63.6% 26.7% 59.8% 44.4%
20 1997 36/40 6.0 5.8 58.7% 71.8% 44.8% 51.3% 37.8% 60.5% 35.9% 1995 4/5 3.3 5.3 59.1% 64.3% 49.1% 64.9% 36.5% 58.1% 37.3%
21 1998 26/29 5.5 3.9 59.7% 72.6% 47.9% 55.6% 44.3% 62.5% 39.5% 1996 11/13 7.4 5.5 50.8% 71.4% 46.3% 60.9% 49.9% 58.9% 35.4%
22 1999 37/43 6.9 3.9 60.4% 72.2% 47.6% 56.4% 39.5% 62.4% 35.7% 1997 15/20 5.0 4.0 55.3% 73.4% 46.6% 51.1% 42.2% 61.9% 36.4%
23 2000 29/30 8.3 4.4 58.7% 73.7% 49.6% 57.8% 36.8% 63.2% 37.6% 1998 13/14 4.8 5.1 55.4% 70.4% 43.7% 63.1% 42.4% 58.7% 36.1%
24 2001 13/15 5.6 5.7 55.5% 71.2% 45.9% 45.8% 36.3% 59.8% 34.1% 1999 3/3 4.7 6.0 51.4% 66.2% 48.4% 35.6% 53.7% 57.6% 38.2%
25 2002 10/11 5.5 5.7 53.9% 69.8% 43.4% 49.0% 29.6% 57.9% 37.0% 2000 6/7 6.2 6.3 53.3% 75.9% 47.1% 61.4% 64.2% 62.5% 34.8%
26 2003 26/26 7.3 4.2 54.5% 73.8% 45.2% 63.5% 42.7% 60.7% 36.5% 2001 10/12 3.8 5.9 54.5% 72.5% 51.0% 67.8% 51.1% 62.9% 35.0%
27 2004 6/6 4.5 5.5 48.7% 73.2% 49.4% 40.7% 26.3% 60.7% 35.9% 2002 7/9 3.6 4.9 55.7% 69.9% 39.6% 47.1% 38.2% 56.2% 38.9%
28 2005 17/17 11.4 4.9 56.8% 77.1% 52.2% 59.4% 40.1% 66.2% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 34/34 7.0 2.9 56.6% 72.4% 47.8% 63.7% 36.2% 61.7% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 13/13 4.3 4.8 57.1% 65.3% 43.1% 49.5% 26.4% 55.8% 29.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 259/278 6.8 4.4 57.4% 72.4% 47.1% 55.6% 38.2% 61.5% 35.9% — 71/85 5.0 5.1 54.1% 71.4% 46.2% 58.2% 45.7% 60.0% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Justin Gimelstob Neville Godwin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1484 97.9 -2.47 -0.18 0.770 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.18
18 1995 1530 110.0 -1.36 +1.92 0.750 45.8% — — — 37.5% -0.63 1–0 — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1510 118.9 +0.13 +0.36 0.915 48.2% +28 — — 29.6% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -0.63 1994 1468 98.1 0.00 -1.69 1.105 51.2% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.24
20 1997 1630 134.5 -1.35 -0.78 0.909 48.5% +30 — -55 43.3% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 10–8 (56%) 103.8 +0.60 1995 1475 102.5 -1.33 -1.24 0.891 47.8% +21 — — 40.0% -0.47 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.50
21 1998 1661 129.0 +0.39 +1.22 1.052 50.8% -10 -75 -71 50.7% +0.12 6–8 (43%) 4–9 (31%) 96.0 -0.12 1996 1595 121.4 -1.47 -0.05 0.861 47.4% -44 — +97 50.0% -0.44 2–2 (50%) 3–0 (100%) 104.0 +0.40
22 1999 1645 137.7 -0.21 -1.19 0.949 49.1% +36 -75 -122 45.0% -0.28 3–10 (23%) 7–12 (37%) 91.8 -1.22 1997 1549 118.2 -0.65 +0.07 0.955 49.1% +12 — +124 40.0% -0.22 2–2 (50%) 4–9 (31%) 96.8 +1.06
23 2000 1675 126.8 +0.05 +0.25 1.022 50.4% +34 -174 -115 47.5% -0.40 5–7 (42%) 10–6 (63%) 99.6 +0.17 1998 1582 111.8 -2.26 -0.48 0.875 47.6% -21 — +121 42.9% -0.54 5–1 (83%) 3–2 (60%) 105.4 +1.25
24 2001 1596 108.5 -1.35 -2.71 0.849 47.0% +17 — -76 29.3% -1.39 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.32 1999 1568 102.9 -2.65 +1.66 0.900 48.3% — — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 1–0 — +0.33
25 2002 1620 119.3 -1.95 +1.16 0.880 46.9% +9 — -59 40.7% -0.81 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.03 2000 1616 116.4 +0.81 -0.99 0.928 48.8% -57 — +95 45.5% -0.05 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.11
26 2003 1532 117.2 -2.07 -0.87 0.929 48.9% +13 — +76 40.0% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 95.7 +1.70 2001 1578 110.6 -0.58 -1.74 0.944 49.2% -112 — +212 46.9% -0.06 2–4 (33%) 4–4 (50%) 96.0 +1.24
27 2004 1507 110.1 -0.55 -0.52 0.913 47.3% +4 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — -0.42 2002 1489 103.3 -2.83 -0.17 0.890 47.4% -52 — +200 28.6% -1.48 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.0 -0.29
28 2005 1596 127.5 +2.04 +0.31 1.059 51.1% -56 — +71 48.9% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 6–7 (46%) 99.7 -0.05 2003 1503 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 1606 122.4 -0.69 -1.72 0.913 49.0% -77 -132 +106 44.9% -0.32 3–5 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 100.7 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1537 116.4 -4.94 -3.75 0.668 43.5% -37 — +128 10.0% -2.37 0–1 0–2 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1722 132.5 -0.75 -0.68 0.933 48.8% +5 -103 -6 41.7% -0.51 35–56 (38%) 51–68 (43%) 92.8 +0.10 — 1670 117.3 -1.29 -0.45 0.907 48.2% -27 — +148 42.0% -0.43 17–15 (53%) 19–23 (45%) 100.0 +5.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.