H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Justin Gimelstob vs Paul Goldstein H2H: 1-1
Justin Gimelstob and Paul Goldstein are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Goldstein won the 2006 Miami Masters first round 3-6 7-6(6) 1-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2006* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Paul Goldstein | 3-6 7-6(6) 1-1 (ret.) | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
| Jul 29, 2000* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Justin Gimelstob | 3-0 (ret.) | Paul Goldstein | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,721 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paul Goldstein | #1,120 | #58 | 668 | 1,746 | 85 | 115 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Justin Gimelstob | Paul Goldstein | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #781 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1219 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1011 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #432 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #189 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #81 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #182 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #107 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #190 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #67 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #70 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #166 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |