H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Justin Gimelstob vs Sebastien Lareau H2H: 0-1

Sebastien Lareau holds a 1–0 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sebastien Lareau leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sebastien Lareau won the 1999 Canadian Open round of 64 7-6(2) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Justin Gimelstob
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Sebastien Lareau
CAN Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sebastien Lareau #116 7-6(2) 6-1 Justin Gimelstob #103 Match data Aug 4, 1999* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Justin Gimelstob #841 #63 733 1,722 107 171 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sebastien Lareau #1,018 #76 622 1,720 83 122 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Justin Gimelstob Sebastien Lareau
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,493 0 0
18 1995 1–1 50.0% — 1,529 0 0 1991 1–1 50.0% #349 1,505 0 0
19 1996 3–9 25.0% #152 1,510 0 0 1992 1–2 33.3% #197 1,501 0 0
20 1997 17–23 42.5% #104 1,630 0 0 1993 2–3 40.0% #131 1,531 0 0
21 1998 14–15 48.3% #80 1,661 0 0 1994 3–13 18.8% #119 1,482 0 0
22 1999 17–26 39.5% #82 1,645 0 0 1995 12–17 41.4% #136 1,557 0 0
23 2000 14–16 46.7% #97 1,675 0 0 1996 15–15 50.0% #105 1,676 0 0
24 2001 3–12 20.0% #177 1,595 0 0 1997 8–15 34.8% #187 1,591 0 0
25 2002 5–6 45.5% #106 1,619 0 0 1998 19–19 50.0% #79 1,657 0 0
26 2003 9–17 34.6% #106 1,532 0 0 1999 12–18 40.0% #102 1,616 0 0
27 2004 1–5 16.7% #162 1,507 0 0 2000 5–11 31.2% #124 1,597 0 0
28 2005 8–9 47.1% #104 1,595 0 0 2001 5–7 41.7% #229 1,522 0 0
29 2006 14–20 41.2% #86 1,606 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2007 1–12 7.7% #556 1,537 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Justin Gimelstob Sebastien Lareau
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 15 16 31 48.4% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1993 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1999 13 16 29 44.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
23 2000 10 9 19 52.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1996 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2001 2 10 12 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1997 6 11 17 35.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2002 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1998 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 2003 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1999 9 14 23 39.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
27 2004 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2005 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2001 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 71 112 183 38.8% 8 17 25 32.0% 24 35 59 40.7% 4 7 11 36.4% — 57 80 137 41.6% 1 9 10 10.0% 12 19 31 38.7% 13 14 27 48.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 259/278 of Justin Gimelstob's and 180/204 of Sebastien Lareau's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Justin Gimelstob Sebastien Lareau
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1995 2/2 8.0 5.0 62.7% 69.5% 44.6% 68.1% 31.7% 59.4% 30.5% 1991 2/2 13.0 6.5 44.7% 74.2% 46.6% 49.3% 21.8% 58.6% 38.4%
19 1996 10/12 5.1 3.4 54.9% 73.3% 46.5% 41.8% 50.8% 61.4% 35.3% 1992 3/3 3.0 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 47.5% 71.6% 33.3% 60.1% 43.6%
20 1997 36/40 6.0 5.8 58.7% 71.8% 44.8% 51.3% 37.8% 60.5% 35.9% 1993 2/5 6.5 12.0 49.5% 67.9% 34.2% 35.0% 40.3% 51.0% 33.7%
21 1998 26/29 5.5 3.9 59.7% 72.6% 47.9% 55.6% 44.3% 62.5% 39.5% 1994 14/16 7.1 6.0 54.3% 71.6% 41.9% 59.4% 34.6% 58.4% 35.9%
22 1999 37/43 6.9 3.9 60.4% 72.2% 47.6% 56.4% 39.5% 62.4% 35.7% 1995 28/29 8.4 5.7 56.5% 76.7% 43.5% 58.3% 37.7% 62.2% 36.7%
23 2000 29/30 8.3 4.4 58.7% 73.7% 49.6% 57.8% 36.8% 63.2% 37.6% 1996 26/30 6.1 4.0 59.9% 71.5% 50.8% 64.3% 47.9% 63.2% 39.9%
24 2001 13/15 5.6 5.7 55.5% 71.2% 45.9% 45.8% 36.3% 59.8% 34.1% 1997 23/23 3.8 6.1 61.6% 68.4% 40.6% 53.6% 40.6% 57.7% 38.5%
25 2002 10/11 5.5 5.7 53.9% 69.8% 43.4% 49.0% 29.6% 57.9% 37.0% 1998 32/38 7.6 3.8 66.4% 70.8% 45.2% 63.1% 40.7% 62.4% 37.7%
26 2003 26/26 7.3 4.2 54.5% 73.8% 45.2% 63.5% 42.7% 60.7% 36.5% 1999 25/30 6.4 3.0 61.4% 69.6% 51.7% 65.1% 48.9% 62.4% 35.8%
27 2004 6/6 4.5 5.5 48.7% 73.2% 49.4% 40.7% 26.3% 60.7% 35.9% 2000 13/16 6.2 3.8 62.2% 67.8% 49.9% 56.8% 39.7% 60.7% 35.5%
28 2005 17/17 11.4 4.9 56.8% 77.1% 52.2% 59.4% 40.1% 66.2% 35.8% 2001 12/12 4.4 3.0 61.3% 68.4% 46.5% 53.3% 34.0% 60.1% 33.5%
29 2006 34/34 7.0 2.9 56.6% 72.4% 47.8% 63.7% 36.2% 61.7% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 13/13 4.3 4.8 57.1% 65.3% 43.1% 49.5% 26.4% 55.8% 29.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 259/278 6.8 4.4 57.4% 72.4% 47.1% 55.6% 38.2% 61.5% 35.9% — 180/205 6.5 4.5 60.5% 71.0% 46.1% 59.9% 41.1% 61.1% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Justin Gimelstob Sebastien Lareau
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1494 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
18 1995 1530 110.0 -1.36 +1.92 0.750 45.8% — — — 37.5% -0.63 1–0 — — -0.13 1991 1505 103.4 +1.23 -0.86 0.927 48.0% — — — 50.0% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — +0.22
19 1996 1510 118.9 +0.13 +0.36 0.915 48.2% +28 — — 29.6% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -0.63 1992 1502 106.2 -0.04 +0.85 1.094 50.9% +40 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.31
20 1997 1630 134.5 -1.35 -0.78 0.909 48.5% +30 — -55 43.3% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 10–8 (56%) 103.8 +0.60 1993 1531 110.6 -0.23 +0.55 0.687 43.1% — — +53 35.7% -1.21 1–0 2–0 — -0.06
21 1998 1661 129.0 +0.39 +1.22 1.052 50.8% -10 -75 -71 50.7% +0.12 6–8 (43%) 4–9 (31%) 96.0 -0.12 1994 1482 116.2 -2.66 -0.77 0.864 47.4% +32 — — 26.8% -1.29 2–4 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 99.4 +0.37
22 1999 1645 137.7 -0.21 -1.19 0.949 49.1% +36 -75 -122 45.0% -0.28 3–10 (23%) 7–12 (37%) 91.8 -1.22 1995 1558 135.8 +0.09 -0.30 0.971 49.2% +40 — -29 40.8% -0.44 2–4 (33%) 5–6 (45%) 97.8 -0.07
23 2000 1675 126.8 +0.05 +0.25 1.022 50.4% +34 -174 -115 47.5% -0.40 5–7 (42%) 10–6 (63%) 99.6 +0.17 1996 1677 142.6 +0.84 +2.33 1.084 51.2% -11 — -78 51.5% +0.25 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -1.30
24 2001 1596 108.5 -1.35 -2.71 0.849 47.0% +17 — -76 29.3% -1.39 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.32 1997 1591 120.1 -2.53 +0.23 0.910 48.2% +7 -69 +10 35.7% -0.84 2–2 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 99.1 -0.18
25 2002 1620 119.3 -1.95 +1.16 0.880 46.9% +9 — -59 40.7% -0.81 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.03 1998 1658 133.0 +0.45 +0.31 1.002 49.8% +23 — -40 51.5% -0.07 5–6 (45%) 11–9 (55%) 103.4 +0.89
26 2003 1532 117.2 -2.07 -0.87 0.929 48.9% +13 — +76 40.0% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 95.7 +1.70 1999 1617 128.1 +0.03 -1.37 0.950 49.1% +16 — +14 41.3% -0.45 6–7 (46%) 7–7 (50%) 100.5 +1.09
27 2004 1507 110.1 -0.55 -0.52 0.913 47.3% +4 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — -0.42 2000 1598 117.1 -1.05 -1.01 0.904 48.4% +32 — +5 40.9% -0.57 0–5 (0%) 4–5 (44%) 94.2 +0.40
28 2005 1596 127.5 +2.04 +0.31 1.059 51.1% -56 — +71 48.9% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 6–7 (46%) 99.7 -0.05 2001 1522 107.8 -0.57 -2.57 0.841 47.2% +60 — — 39.3% -0.89 3–1 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 +0.82
29 2006 1606 122.4 -0.69 -1.72 0.913 49.0% -77 -132 +106 44.9% -0.32 3–5 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 100.7 +0.54 2002 1503 93.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1537 116.4 -4.94 -3.75 0.668 43.5% -37 — +128 10.0% -2.37 0–1 0–2 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1722 132.5 -0.75 -0.68 0.933 48.8% +5 -103 -6 41.7% -0.51 35–56 (38%) 51–68 (43%) 92.8 +0.10 — 1721 133.2 -0.41 -0.11 0.955 49.1% +21 -69 -10 42.5% -0.47 25–35 (42%) 43–47 (48%) 100.9 +1.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.