H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Botic van de Zandschulp holds a 1–0 lead over Kamil Majchrzak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Botic van de Zandschulp leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2021 Adelaide International second round 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Kamil Majchrzak | Match data | Feb 4, 2021* | R32 | Adelaide International | ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kamil Majchrzak | #73 | #45 | 1,032 | 1,823 | 48 | 60 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #70 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,933 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kamil Majchrzak | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,854 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,836 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #62 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #70 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Kamil Majchrzak | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 21 | 2017 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2022 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2022 | 18 | 17 | 35 | 51.4% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 29 | 2025 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2025 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 30 | 2026 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2026 | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| Career | — | 28 | 36 | 64 | 43.8% | 9 | 16 | 25 | 36.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | — | 77 | 76 | 153 | 50.3% | 32 | 32 | 64 | 50.0% | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 106/109 of Kamil Majchrzak's and 242/243 of Botic van de Zandschulp's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Kamil Majchrzak | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 21 | 2017 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 52.2% | 68.6% | 46.9% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 58.2% | 24.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 9/9 | 7.2 | 5.4 | 58.5% | 73.0% | 50.4% | 51.3% | 37.6% | 63.7% | 33.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 3/3 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 53.3% | 67.2% | 45.7% | 49.7% | 47.2% | 56.6% | 30.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 11/12 | 5.6 | 2.1 | 62.8% | 68.0% | 45.7% | 62.7% | 41.0% | 60.3% | 34.7% | 2021 | 25/25 | 7.0 | 4.4 | 62.4% | 75.0% | 49.1% | 62.9% | 32.0% | 65.1% | 35.5% |
| 26 | 2022 | 26/26 | 5.7 | 1.9 | 61.3% | 72.3% | 51.8% | 66.5% | 41.3% | 64.4% | 35.5% | 2022 | 62/62 | 6.5 | 3.9 | 63.4% | 71.7% | 49.1% | 59.5% | 43.9% | 63.1% | 38.8% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 44/44 | 5.7 | 3.6 | 62.8% | 69.5% | 47.5% | 58.2% | 36.3% | 61.1% | 38.0% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 36/36 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 60.9% | 69.3% | 43.7% | 60.4% | 41.8% | 59.3% | 36.8% |
| 29 | 2025 | 26/27 | 6.2 | 1.8 | 62.3% | 72.3% | 51.7% | 51.7% | 37.7% | 64.5% | 37.5% | 2025 | 35/36 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 60.9% | 73.1% | 47.4% | 52.3% | 41.4% | 63.1% | 37.5% |
| 30 | 2026 | 30/31 | 6.8 | 1.8 | 64.3% | 72.0% | 53.4% | 53.6% | 38.6% | 65.2% | 34.9% | 2026 | 40/40 | 7.1 | 4.8 | 62.1% | 73.6% | 45.9% | 65.0% | 46.6% | 63.3% | 38.9% |
| Career | — | 106/109 | 6.3 | 2.2 | 62.0% | 71.6% | 51.2% | 56.9% | 39.6% | 63.9% | 35.3% | — | 242/243 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 62.2% | 71.8% | 47.2% | 59.6% | 41.0% | 62.4% | 37.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Kamil Majchrzak | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 21 | 2017 | 1526 | 107.3 | -0.17 | -1.59 | 0.578 | 42.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.05 | 2017 | 1516 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 1517 | 102.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1492 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 1675 | 126.9 | -0.35 | -0.48 | 0.926 | 48.3% | -10 | — | +21 | 36.0% | -0.80 | 2–1 (67%) | 3–4 (43%) | — | +0.35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 1612 | 113.6 | -1.49 | -0.22 | 0.697 | 44.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.75 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.04 | 2020 | 1480 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 1661 | 123.9 | -1.34 | -1.11 | 0.875 | 48.0% | -45 | -39 | — | 37.5% | -0.97 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | +0.67 | 2021 | 1855 | 136.1 | +1.69 | +0.20 | 1.015 | 50.0% | -21 | — | — | 53.2% | +0.18 | 6–3 (67%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | -0.41 |
| 26 | 2022 | 1663 | 128.8 | +0.34 | -0.25 | 0.995 | 50.3% | -9 | -61 | -7 | 49.2% | +0.06 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–8 (33%) | — | +1.31 | 2022 | 1836 | 154.1 | +0.18 | +2.55 | 1.051 | 50.8% | -34 | -42 | -60 | 52.7% | +0.19 | 9–8 (53%) | 16–9 (64%) | — | -1.63 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1793 | 143.4 | -2.02 | +2.12 | 0.976 | 49.5% | +31 | -62 | -91 | 44.6% | -0.30 | 10–7 (59%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +0.41 |
| 28 | 2024 | 1658 | 108.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1779 | 143.2 | -3.37 | +1.62 | 0.904 | 48.2% | +15 | -55 | -84 | 38.8% | -0.74 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | -2.47 |
| 29 | 2025 | 1752 | 136.4 | -0.04 | +1.62 | 1.056 | 51.0% | -22 | -149 | -21 | 53.5% | +0.34 | 3–5 (38%) | 7–7 (50%) | — | -0.42 | 2025 | 1715 | 142.0 | -0.75 | +1.66 | 1.018 | 50.0% | +27 | -14 | — | 45.7% | -0.22 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–11 (39%) | — | -1.80 |
| 30 | 2026 | 1766 | 143.3 | +0.38 | +0.09 | 1.003 | 50.2% | -25 | -182 | +38 | 49.4% | -0.07 | 7–6 (54%) | 13–8 (62%) | — | -1.52 | 2026 | 1779 | 145.0 | -0.88 | +2.63 | 1.057 | 51.2% | +42 | -74 | -137 | 56.3% | +0.39 | 4–8 (33%) | 16–10 (62%) | — | -0.06 |
| Career | — | 1823 | 136.1 | -0.03 | +0.18 | 0.978 | 49.8% | -21 | -112 | +15 | 46.1% | -0.20 | 15–19 (44%) | 28–31 (47%) | 98.7 | +0.28 | — | 1933 | 148.6 | -0.90 | +1.98 | 1.006 | 50.0% | +8 | -49 | -86 | 48.9% | -0.06 | 38–38 (50%) | 62–53 (54%) | 105.3 | -2.45 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Khachanov | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 28, 2025 | H2H |
| Miomir Kecmanovic | 1 | 3 | 4 | Mar 19, 2026 | H2H |
| Alejandro Tabilo | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Alex de Minaur | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 14, 2026 | H2H |
| Hamad Medjedovic | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 5, 2024 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Ugo Humbert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 3, 2025 | H2H |
| Adrian Mannarino | 4 | 1 | 5 | Feb 28, 2024 | H2H |